"Please state your name, business occupation or profession, and place of residence," began Searle, putting the opening interrogatory in the usual form through sheer force of habit. "I am an actress by profession. My name is Alice Higgins; my place of residence is New York City." "In your profession as an actress and to the public generally you are known as Marien Dounay?" "Yes," replied the witness. "You are the complainant in this action?" "Yes." "I will ask you," began Searle, "if you have ever seen this necklace before?" He drew from a crumpled envelope that familiar tiny string of fire and offered it to the witness. Miss Dounay took it, passed it affectionately through her fingers, during which the brilliance of the gems appeared to be magnified, and then, holding the necklace by the two ends, dropped it for a moment upon her bosom,—a touch of naturalness that was either the height of art or the supreme of femininity. "They are my diamonds," she replied. "And what is their value?" "Twenty-two thousand dollars." "Lawful money of the United States?" "Yes." "Now, Miss Dounay," continued Searle, "will you be kind enough to relate to the Court when and under what circumstances you first missed your diamonds." Miss Dounay told her story briefly and skillfully, with an appearance of reluctance when she came to relate the circumstances and facts which pointed to the minister as the thief. She stated that Hampstead had always shown curiosity regarding the diamonds and had especially questioned her concerning their value. As a trusted friend, whom she had known for years, and who during the last several weeks had visited her frequently and become rather frankly acquainted with her personal habits and mode of life, he knew where she kept the diamonds. That so far as she knew, he was the only one of her acquaintances who possessed this knowledge; that she had worn the diamonds in company with him during the evening preceding the supper party, at which she appeared without them; that no one but her guests were in this room in which the diamonds were kept temporarily, and that no one but him, so far as she remembered observing, was in that room alone; that it was her custom to keep the box containing these and other jewels in the hotel safe, and when, after the departure of her guests, she went to the casket to send it down-stairs, it was gone. Her story done, and to the attorney’s complete satisfaction, Searle then put the final formal questions: "This property was taken against your will and without your consent?" "Yes." "This all happened in the City of Oakland, County of Alameda and the State of California?" "Yes." "That is all," concluded the prosecutor. "Cross-examine," directed the Court, turning to the defendant. "I have no desire to cross-examine," replied the minister quietly, but again with that vibrant, far-carrying note in his utterance. "You are excused," said the judge to the actress.