Classical literature; Greece -- History -- Peloponnesian War, 431-404 B.C.; Greece -- History -- Spartan and Theban Supremacies, 404-362 B.C.
with our stalwart and numerous Penestae? (6) Which will better support
mariners--a nation which, like our own, out of her abundance exports her
corn to foreign parts, or Athens, which, but for foreign purchases, has
not enough to support herself? And so as to wealth in general it is
only natural, is it not, that we, who do not look to a string of little
islands for supplies, but gather the fruits of continental peoples,
should find our resources more copious? As soon as the scattered powers
of Thessaly are gathered into a principality, all the tribes around, I
repeat, will become our tributaries. I need not tell you that the king
of Persia reaps the fruits, not of islands, but of a continent, and he
is the wealthiest of men! But the reduction of Persia will be still more
practicable, I imagine, than that of Hellas, for there the men, save
one, are better versed in slavery than in prowess. Nor have I forgotten,
during the advance of Cyrus, and afterwards under Agesilaus, how scant
the force was before which the Persian quailed.'
(3) Or, "his underlord in Epirus." By hyparch, I suppose, is implied
that Alcetas regarded Jason as his suzerain. Diodorus (xv. 13, 36)
speaks of him as "king" of the Molossians.
(4) Or, "Prince," and below, "Thessaly so converted into a
Principality." "The Tagos of Thessaly was not a King, because his
office was not hereditary or even permanent; neither was he
exactly a Tyrant, because his office had some sort of legal
sanction. But he came much nearer to the character either of a
King or of a Tyrant than to that of a Federal President like the
General of the Achaians.... Jason of Pherai acts throughout
like a King, and his will seems at least as uncontrolled as that
of his brother sovereign beyond the Kambunian hills. Even Jason
seems to have been looked upon as a Tyrant (see below, 'Hell.' VI.
iv. 32); possibly, like the Athenian Demos, he himself did not
refuse the name" (cf. Arist. "Pol." iii. 4, 9).--Freeman, "Hist.
Fed. Gov." "No True Federation in Thessaly," iv. pp. 152 foll.
(5) See above, and Hicks, 74.
(6) Or, "peasantry."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account