ground both Fisher and he rejected the plea of conscience when urged
by heretics condemned to the flames. The dispute, indeed, passes the
wit of man to decide. If conscience must reign supreme, all government
is a _pis aller_, and in anarchy the true millennium must be found. If
conscience is deposed, man sinks to the level of the lower creation.
Human society can only be based on compromise, and compromise itself
is a matter of conscience. Fisher and More protested by their death
against a principle which they had practised in life; both they and
the heretics whom they persecuted proclaimed, as Antigone had done
thousands of years before,[938] that they could not obey laws (p. 334)
which they could not believe God had made.
[Footnote 933: _L. and P._, viii., 52; Rymer, xiv.,
549.]
[Footnote 934: The general idea that Fisher and
More were executed for refusing to take an oath
prescribed in the Act of Supremacy is technically
inaccurate. No oath is there prescribed, and not
till 1536 was it made high treason to refuse to
take the oath of supremacy; even then the oath was
to be administered only to civil and ecclesiastical
officers. The Act under which they were executed
was 26 Henry VIII., c. 13, and the common mistake
arises from a confusion between the oath to the
succession and the oath of supremacy.]
[Footnote 935: _L. and P._, viii., 876.]
[Footnote 936: _L. and P._, iv., 6199; vi., 1164,
1249. He told Chapuys that if Charles invaded
England he would be doing "a work as agreeable to
God as going against the Turk," and suggested that
the Emperor should make use of Reginald Pole "to
whom, according to many, the kingdom would belong"
(Chapuys to Charles, 27th September, 1533). Again,
says Chapuys, "the holy Bishop of Rochester would
like you to take active measures immediately, as I
wrote in my last; which advice he has sent to me
again lately to repeat" (10th October, 1533). Canon
Whitney, in criticising Froude (_Engl. Hist. Rev._,
xii., 353), asserts that "nothing Chapuys says
justifies the charge against Fisher!"]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account