Hephæstus : $b or, The soul of the machineFournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Philosophy
Hephæstus : $b or, The soul of the machine
Fournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Machinery; Progress
[2] It is curious in this connection that among the legends of
the Saints there is no record of a decapitated person being
brought back to life. The angels or departed saints who came
to heal the torn breasts of martyred Christian virgins were
unable to put heads back on bleeding trunks, even though the
tongues in some of those heads were empowered to testify for
some time after they would, in the ordinary course of things,
have become silent for ever.
If we examine the connection between man and his weapon we find that
the latter differs from an eagle’s beak or a tiger’s claw in but one
essential point: it is no longer an integral part of the organism. It
can be detached at will, and replaced by another weapon. Its separation
or destruction does not imply an injury to the organism. Man is not
put out of action by losing his weapon. He is only reduced to his
original position with respect to his antagonist. And even that is no
irreparable loss so long as he has other weapons at his command. Thus
the same step which vastly increased his offensive power also made him
comparatively immune to attack.
Now, a weapon in a man’s hand, so long as it is in active use as a
weapon, is a part of the man himself. It is true that he can lose it
without perishing himself, but he can also lose an arm or a leg and
still survive. The mere fact that the man’s blood circulates in his
natural leg and not in a wooden leg he may substitute for it makes
no essential difference. He may kick with either. And we know that
a man’s leg, like all the cells of his body, is largely compound
of inert matter such as food products and waste products, besides
being nine-tenths water――an inorganic substance. A wooden leg, or any
weapon which a man may use, may therefore be regarded as a limb of the
man’s body, so long, that is, as it is in active use. And if a “soul”
animates that man’s body and drives it to perform deeds of valour, the
same soul will animate his weapon. The soul of the weapon is the soul
of the man who uses it.
There is an increasing tendency in modern thought to abolish the
distinction between soul and body and to regard them as one and
indivisible. Adopting that view, we may assert that the use of a weapon
means the enlargement of a man’s body and the simultaneous expansion
of his soul. Every weapon, every tool, every machine is the embodiment
of a human thought and purpose. The user adopts that thought and
purpose, and behold――the machine has found its soul!
II
Man is an animal who laughs and cooks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account