Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologistsDuncan, P. Martin (Peter Martin)
History
Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologists
Duncan, P. Martin (Peter Martin)
Naturalists
years was a representative of the town, doing good work for the poor, for
liberty by receiving and protecting political fugitives and by insisting
on the freedom of the press, which was considerably hated in France under
the restored Bourbons. Nevertheless, year after year he taught well,
and most of the great botanists of later years were either his students
or his visitors and friends. As age crept on, De Candolle continued his
researches, and got through the description and classification of a
considerable number of known plants. These were published in a book which
will always be his masterpiece. Honours crowded on him, the gifts of
learned societies of all nations, and he visited most of the great cities
of the Continent. In 1832 he published the second part of his work. He
had great happiness with his wife, and his parents lived to great ages,
content with the prosperity of their son, who was ever good and loving
to them, and got his reward. He had a little estate, out of Geneva, at
Saint Seine, and enjoyed it much; but, as years rolled on, the death of
a son there, affected his tender heart, and he sold the place and bought
another, called La Barrière, near Geneva. His eldest son, Alphonse,
followed well in the father’s steps. Finally, when old age troubled De
Candolle, he gave up his professorship.
Ill health succeeded, but the man worked on at his great book, and even
entered the political arena once again at a time of emergency. The winter
of 1840-41 was one of illness, and he could no longer work. His friends
were dying off, month after month, and when death came to him, he was
content. He had been a good son, an excellent father, a loving friend,
a true patriot, deserving everything that elevated mankind; and it is
admitted by all botanists that he consolidated the science, and gave it
a definite natural classification.
De Candolle early in life grasped the truth that plants grow, reproduce,
and arrive at maturity, not by accident, but according to natural law,
and he soon saw that some parts of plants were of more importance to
their well-being and multiplication than others. He was thus a follower
of Ray, and he became impressed with the belief that in arranging plants,
the resemblances of the most important parts and organs, should be
considered before those of the less important. This manner of proceeding
he called the natural method. It was founded upon the knowledge of the
anatomy of the plants and upon their physiology, and the method required
care and research. The artificial method of Linnæus enabled botanists to
distinguish plants readily, by examining the most readily examined, and
often unimportant, parts of the plant’s flower. It was not a scientific
plan, but a ready method. It did not bring one plant into relation with
another, showing the common method of growth and reproduction, but simply
enabled one plant to be separated and distinguished from another, and
this is the least part of botany.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account