Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologists — John Shaqi
Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologistsDuncan, P. Martin (Peter Martin)
History
Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologists
Duncan, P. Martin (Peter Martin)
Naturalists
Aristoteles was born at Stageira, in the year 384 B.C., and it is
interesting to note that his wonderful love of nature was fostered by,
and, indeed, probably arose from the profession of his father. His
father was the physician and friend of Amyntas, King of Macedonia, and
his mother was a descendant of the great physician Æsculapius. The young
Aristoteles lost both his parents at an early period of his life, but the
son of Amyntas, called Philip, was his friend, and kind people brought
the boy up. We know nothing of the boy’s habits or method of life; but
it can be readily understood by those who read these lives, and have had
a love of nature, before the experience of such a calamity as the loss
of parents, that many an hour of sorrow was shortened and solaced by
studying the graceful and blooming plants and the movements and habits
of animals. Certain it is that the boy loved study, and it soon became
evident that his loss was compensated, as it is very often in such
cases, by a spirit of self-reliance. In his eighteenth year he went to
Athens to study the healing art. When Aristoteles was about twenty-one
years of age, the philosopher Plato returned from Sicily, and the young
man then seems to have cared more for the study of the sciences which
were requisite for a polished physician, than for the art of healing.
He made his first self-sacrifice, as many a man has done since; he gave
up the uncertainties of the art of curing diseases, and learned natural
history and philosophy. His eagerness for knowledge and his extraordinary
acuteness and sagacity doubtless attracted Plato’s notice, who soon
called him “the intellect of the school,” and said his house was “the
house of the reader.” As Aristoteles grew up, his early training and his
love of the truth seen in nature, began to separate him from the common
run of men, and his self-reliance began to make him an antagonist to the
teachings even of the great Plato. But this opposition was not that of a
vain and conceited young man. Plato had noticed his ability, and he was
really a man of mark, whose opinions were valuable. Aristoteles studied
facts, and knew many truths about natural history, but his wonderful
master cared more for ideas. Such men must always clash, and Aristoteles
writes in one of his books about his opposition to the philosophy of
Plato, that it is painful to refute the doctrine of ideas, as it has
been introduced by persons who were his friends; “nevertheless it is a
duty to disregard such private feelings, for both philosophers and truth
are dear to me, but it is right to give the preference to truth.” Truth!
what is truth? said Pilate, and turned from the true. The Creator’s
light, seen with our longing eyes, precious beyond conception, the
sweetest solace of intellect; what is, what was—yet not to be defined by
finite man. The very root of science, it is that which we are to hold in
our consciences against all opposition. Appreciated by the savage, dear
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account