Hiawatha and the Iroquois Confederation: A Study in Anthropology. A Paper Read at the Cincinnati Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in August, 1881, under the Title of "A Lawgiver of the Stone Age." — John Shaqi
Hiawatha and the Iroquois Confederation: A Study in Anthropology. A Paper Read at the Cincinnati Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in August, 1881, under the Title of "A Lawgiver of the Stone Age."Hale, Horatio
History
Hiawatha and the Iroquois Confederation: A Study in Anthropology. A Paper Read at the Cincinnati Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in August, 1881, under the Title of "A Lawgiver of the Stone Age."
Hale, Horatio
Hiawatha, active 15th century; Iroquois Indians
E-text prepared by Al Haines from digital material generously made
available by Internet Archive/American Libraries
(http://www.archive.org/details/americana)
Note: Images of the original pages are available through
Internet Archive/American Libraries. See
http://www.archive.org/details/hiawathandiroquo00halerich
HIAWATHA AND THE IROQUOIS CONFEDERATION.
A Study in Anthropology
by
HORATIO HALE.
A Paper Read at the Cincinnati Meeting of the American Association for
the Advancement of Science, in August, 1881, under the Title of "A
Lawgiver of the Stone Age."
Salem, Mass.:
Printed at the Salem Press.
1881.
A LAWGIVER OF THE STONE AGE. By HORATIO HALE, of Clinton, Ontario,
Canada.
What was the intellectual capacity of man when he made his first
appearance upon the earth? Or, to speak with more scientific precision
(as the question relates to material evidences), what were the mental
powers of the people who fashioned the earliest stone implements, which
are admitted to be the oldest remaining traces of our kind? As these
people were low in the arts of life, were they also low in natural
capacity? This is certainly one of the most important questions which
the science of anthropology has yet to answer. Of late years the
prevalent disposition has apparently been to answer it in the
affirmative. Primitive man, we are to believe, had a feeble and narrow
intellect, which in the progress of civilization has been gradually
strengthened and enlarged. This conclusion is supposed to be in
accordance with the development theory; and the distinguished author of
that theory has seemed to favor this view. Yet, in fact, the development
theory has nothing to do with the question. If we suppose that the
existing and--so far as we know--the only species of man appeared upon
the earth with the physical conformation and mental capacity which he
retains at this day, we make merely the same supposition with regard to
him that we make with regard to every other existing species of animal.
How it was that this species came to exist is another question altogether.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account