Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2Eliot, Charles
Religion
Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2
Eliot, Charles
Asia -- Religion; Buddhism; Hinduism
[Footnote 691: There is a curious tendency in India to regard the male
principle as quiescent, the female as active and stimulating. The
Chinese, who are equally fond of using these two principles in their
cosmological speculations, adopt the opposite view. The _Yang_ (male)
is positive and active. The _Yin_ (female) is negative and passive.]
[Footnote 692: The Mahânirvâṇa Tantra seems to have been composed in
Bengal since it recommends for sacrificial purposes (VI. 7) three
kinds of fish said to be characteristic of that region. On the other
hand Buddhist works called Tantras are said to have been composed in
north-western India. Udyâna had an old reputation for magic and even
in modern times Śâktism exists in western Tibet and Leh. It is highly
probable that in all these districts the practice of magic and the
worship of mountain goddesses were prevalent, but I find little
evidence that a definite Śâkta sect arose elsewhere than in Bengal and
Assam or that the Śâktist corruption of Buddhism prevailed elsewhere
than in Magadha and Bengal.]
[Footnote 693: But the Brahmans of isolated localities, like Satara in
the Bombay Presidency, are said to be Śâktas and the Kâñculiyas of S.
India are described as a Śâktist sect.]
[Footnote 694: The law-giver Baudhâyana seems to have regarded Aṅga
and Vaṅga with suspicion, I. 1.13, 14.]
[Footnote 695: See especially the story of Manasâ Devi in Dinesh
Chandra Sen (_Beng. Lang. and Lit_. 257), who says the earliest
literary version dates from the twelfth century. But doubtless the
story is much older.]
[Footnote 696: Virâtap. chap. VI. (not in all MSS.). Bhishmap. chap.
XXIII. Also in the Harivaṃsa, _vv._ 3236 ff. Pargiter considers that
the Devî-Mâhâtmya was probably composed in the fifth or sixth century.
Chap. XXI. of the Lotus Sûtra contains a spell invoking a goddess
under many names. Though this chapter is an addition to the original
work, it was translated into Chinese between 265 and 316.]
[Footnote 697: But he does mention the worship of the Divine Mothers.
Harshacar. VII. 250 and Kâdamb. 134.]
[Footnote 698: Hymns to the Devî are also attributed to him but I do
not know what evidence there is for his authorship.]
[Footnote 699: As pointed out elsewhere, though this word is most
commonly used of the Śâkta scriptures it is not restricted to them and
we hear of both Buddhist and Vaishṇava Tantras.]
[Footnote 700: The Adhyâtma Râmâyaṇa is an instance of Śâktist ideas
in another theological setting. It is a Vishnuite work but Sità is
made to say that she is _Prakṛiti_ who does all the deeds related in
the poem, whereas Râma is _Purusha_, inactive and a witness of her
deeds.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account