[Footnote 411: Amitâbha, Amoghasiddhi, Ratnasambhava, Akshobhya, Vairocana, sometimes called Dhyânî Buddhas, but it does not seem that this name was in common use in Java or elsewhere. The Kamahâyânikan calls them the Five Tathâgatas.] [Footnote 412: So in the Kunjarakarna, for which see below. The Kamahâyânikan teaches an elaborate system of Buddha emanations but for purposes of worship it is not quite clear which should be adored as the highest.] [Footnote 413: Fergusson, _History of Indian and Eastern Architecture_, ed. 1910, vol. II. p. 439.] [Footnote 414: See _Archaeologisch Onderzoek op Java en Madura_, I. "Tjandi Djago," 1904; II. "Tj. Singasari en Panataran," 1909.] [Footnote 415: See Knebel in _Tijds. voor Indische T., L. en Volkenkunde_, 41, 1909, p. 27.] [Footnote 416: See passages quoted in _Archaeol. Onderzoek_, I. pp. 96-97.] [Footnote 417: Hayagrîva however may be regarded as a Brahmanic god adopted by the Buddhists.] [Footnote 418: See for reasons and references _Archaeol. Onderzoek_, II. pp. 36-40. The principal members of the king's household probably committed suicide during the funeral ceremonies.] [Footnote 419: Kern in _Tijds. voor T., L. en Volkenkunde_, Deel LII. 1910, p. 107. Similarly in Burma Alompra was popularly regarded as a Bodhisattva.] [Footnote 420: Sanskrit Kavi, a poet. See for Javanese literature Van der Tuuk in _J.R.A.S._ XIII. 1881, p. 42, and Hinloopen Labberton, _ib_. 1913, p. 1. Also the article "Litteratuur" in the _Encyc. van Nederlandsch-Indië_, and many notices in the writings of Kern and Veth.] [Footnote 421: Edited by Gunning, 1903.] [Footnote 422: A fragment of it is printed in _Notulen. Batav. Gen_. LII. 1914, 108.] [Footnote 423: Episodes of the Indian epics have also been used as the subjects of Javanese dramas. See Juynboll, _Indonesische en achterindische tooneelvoorstellingen uit het Râmâyana_, and Hinloopen Labberton, _Pepakem Sapanti Sakoentala_, 1912.] [Footnote 424: Juynboll, _Drie Boeken van het Oudjavaansche Mahâbhârata_, p. 28.] [Footnote 425: _Archaeol. Onderzoek_, I. p. 98. This statement is abundantly confirmed by Krom's index of the proper names in the Nâgarakrĕtâgama in _Tijdschrift_, LVI. 1914, pp. 495 ff.] [Footnote 426: Edited with transl. and notes by J. Kat, 's Gravenhage, 1910.] [Footnote 427: Edited with transl. by H. Kern in _Verh. der K. Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam. Afd. Lett. N.R._ III. 3. 1901.] [Footnote 428: But this probably represents nizbâṇa and is not a Pali form. Cf. Bajra, Bâyu for Vajra, Vâyu.] [Footnote 429: Adyâbhishiktâyushmanta, p. 30. Prâptam buddhatvam bhavadbhir, _ib_. and Esha mârga varah śrîmân mahâyâna mahodayah Yena yûyam gamishyanto bhavishyatha Tathâgatâh.] [Footnote 430: Dâna, śîla, kshânti, vîrya, dhyâna, prajñâ.] [Footnote 431: Maitrî, karunâ, muditâ, upekshâ.]