Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
History
Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
Architecture -- History; Art -- Study and teaching; Historic buildings
From the outside we turn to that of which the outside is after all the
mere shell. When we enter the church we find ourselves in a building
which can fairly hold its own against competitors of its own class.
The nave has a distinct character of its own: there may be differences
of taste as to its merit, but it has a character, and that character
is clearly the result of design. The main lines of the interior are
horizontal rather than vertical. We can hardly say that there is any
division into bays; no vaulting-shafts run up from the ground, nor does
the triforium take, as usual, the form of a distinct composition over
each arch. In short, we cannot, as we can in most churches, take each
arch with the triforium and clerestory over it as a thing existing by
itself. One would rather say that three horizontal ranges, one over
the other, all converged to the centre, without thinking of what was
above or below them. Now tastes may differ as to whether this is a
good arrangement or not, but there is no doubt that it is in its way
an effective arrangement; there is no nave in which the eye is so
irresistibly carried eastward as in that of Wells. And it is worth
notice that this arrangement, in its fullness, is confined to the nave;
in the transepts the bays are much more clearly marked. The idea of
producing this marked horizontal effect was clearly one which came into
the heads of the designers as they were working westwards.
It might have been expected that the marked prominence which is thus
given to the horizontal line might have gone far to destroy all effect
of height in the interior; but it is not so. There is no special
feeling of height in Wells Cathedral--not so much, for instance, as
there is in the church of St. Mary Redcliff; but there is no such
crushing feeling of lowness as there is in Lincoln. This I imagine
to be mainly owing to the form of the arch chosen for the vaulting,
one boldly but not actually pointed, and to the way in which the
lantern-arches fit into the vault. Contrast this with the far larger
and loftier nave of York. In that nave the positive height is second
only to Westminster among English churches, and the design of the
separate bays can hardly be surpassed in its soaring effect. But in
the direct eastern or western view the nave of York loses almost
its whole effect, partly, no doubt, from the excessive breadth, but
partly also from the flat and crushing shape of the vaulting-arch.
The nave of Wells makes the most of its small actual height: so do
the choir and the presbytery also; for, though I cannot at all admire
the kind of vault which is there used, the shape of the arch is as
judiciously chosen as it is in the nave. In the presbytery we also
get the vaulting-shafts rising from the ground, so as to give the
vertical division, and the consequent effect of height, in its highest
perfection. Of the exquisite beauty of the Lady Chapel, looked on, as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account