Historical Epochs of the French Revolution: With The Judgment And Execution Of Louis XVI., King Of France; And A List Of The Members Of The National Convention, Who Voted For And Against His DeathGoudemetz, Henry
History
Historical Epochs of the French Revolution: With The Judgment And Execution Of Louis XVI., King Of France; And A List Of The Members Of The National Convention, Who Voted For And Against His Death
Goudemetz, Henry
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Louis XVI, King of France, 1754-1793
Various causes contributed to effect a revolution in the minds of
Frenchmen, and led the way to a revolution in the state. The
arbitrary nature of the government had been long submitted to, and
perhaps would have continued so much longer, if France had not taken
part in the American war.
The perfidious policy of VERGENNES, who, with a view of humbling the
pride of England, assisted the subject in arms against his Sovereign,
soon imported into his own nation the seeds of liberty, which it had
helped to cultivate in a country of rebellion; and the crown of
France, as I once heard it emphatically observed, was lost in the
plains of America. The soldier returned to Europe with new doctrines
instead of new discipline, and the army in general soon grew
dissatisfied with the Monarch, on account of unusual, and, as they
thought, ignominious rigours which were introduced into it from the
military school of Germany. The King also, from a necessity of
retrenchment, had induced his ministers to adopt some mistaken
measures of economy respecting the troops, and thus increased the
odium which pride had fostered, and by diminishing the splendour of
the crown, stripped it of its security and protection.
To this was added the wanton profusion of the Court in other
expenses, and the external parade and brilliancy, which, if they
impoverish, often dazzle and gratify the people, was exchanged for
familiar entertainments, which gave rise to frequent jealousies among
the nobles, and tended to lower that sense of awe and respect for
royalty among the people, which in monarchies it is of the utmost
importance to preserve.
At this time, also, philosophical discussion had reached its pinnacle
of boldness. Infidelity had woven the web of discord in the human
mind, which was now ripe for experiment, and ROUSSEAU and VOLTAIRE
were the favourite authors.
Previous to the year 1789, from the extreme disorder of the finances,
it became necessary to raise money by extraordinary taxes, which the
common powers of the parliament were deemed insufficient to
authorize; and afraid, in the present temper of the people, to impose
upon them unusual burthens, ministers looked with solicitude for
some other sanctions.
Monsieur DE CALONNE was unwilling to adopt so dangerous an expedient
as that of assembling the states-general; [Footnote: An Assembly
consisting of deputies from the three orders of citizens in France,
namely, the clergy, the nobility, and the tiers-etat; which last
included every French citizen who was not of the clergy or nobility.]
he therefore adopted the expedient of summoning an assembly of
_notables_, or eminent persons, chosen by the King from the different
parts of the kingdom.
This assembly did not prove so favourable to the measures of the
minister as he expected: Monsieur DE CALONNE was displaced, and the
assembly was soon after dissolved, having declared itself incompetent
to decide on the taxes proposed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account