Historical record of the Eighty-eighth Regiment of Foot, or Connaught Rangers : $b containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1793, and of its subsequent services to 1837.Cannon, Richard
History
Historical record of the Eighty-eighth Regiment of Foot, or Connaught Rangers : $b containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1793, and of its subsequent services to 1837.
Cannon, Richard
Great Britain. Army -- History; Great Britain. Army. Regiment of Foot, 88th (Connaught Rangers)
When the EIGHTY-EIGHTH was ordered by Colonel Mackinnon to resume
its place in brigade, the enemy’s fire had ceased, but as soon as
they were seen in motion, it recommenced with double fury; the
wall was knocked down in several places, and one round shot passed
between Colonel Pakenham and Lieutenant-Colonel Wallace, who were on
horseback close to each other. It carried away the top of the wall,
one of the stones striking Lieutenant-Colonel Wallace on the head
and knocking his hat off, but doing him no further injury, though,
for the moment, his men believed he had been killed. The regiment
then quitted the place by companies in file as the safest way to
avoid the effects of the cannonade: the companies returned, left in
front. Colonel Pakenham, with his hat shot through the leaf, and
his hand wrapped up in a pocket handkerchief, called out to Ensign
Grattan as he passed at the head of the foremost company, to know
where he was going, and why he left the village. Being told that it
was in consequence of orders from Colonel Mackinnon, Colonel Pakenham
replied, “I did not observe your _number_. Do as you are directed;
your regiment has done enough for this day; but you may tell whatever
troops you meet, that each man may as well bring a keg of ammunition
under his arm, for those rascals shall never get possession of the
town as long as I have life.” By four o’clock in the afternoon the
regiment had joined its brigade.
The conduct of the EIGHTY-EIGHTH at Fuentes d’Onor (as at Busaco)
obtained the particular notice of Lord Wellington, who, in his
despatch containing the account of that battle, says, “On one of
these occasions, the EIGHTY-EIGHTH, with the Seventy-First and
Seventy-Ninth, under the command of Colonel Mackinnon, charged the
enemy, and drove them through the village. Colonel Mackinnon has
reported particularly the conduct of Lieutenant-Colonel Wallace and
Lieutenant and Adjutant Stewart of the EIGHTY-EIGHTH regiment.”
The loss of the regiment was not so great as might have been expected
from the brilliancy and seriousness of the affair in which it had
been engaged. This comparatively small loss is to be attributed to
the great steadiness and regularity of the men in their different
attacks, and to the rapidity with which, on all occasions, they
closed with their adversaries. Only one officer, Captain Irwin, was
killed, and four wounded, _viz._ Lieutenants Stewart, Macalpin, and
Halket, and Ensign Owgan. Of non-commissioned officers and privates,
seven were killed and fifty-three wounded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account