Historical Record of the First, or Royal Regiment of Foot: Containing an Account of the Origin of the Regiment in the Reign of King James VI. of Scotland, and of Its Subsequent Services to 1846Cannon, Richard
History
Historical Record of the First, or Royal Regiment of Foot: Containing an Account of the Origin of the Regiment in the Reign of King James VI. of Scotland, and of Its Subsequent Services to 1846
Cannon, Richard
Great Britain. Army -- History; Great Britain. Army. Regiment of Foot, 1st (Royal Scots)
The natives of Britain have, at all periods, been celebrated for innate
courage and unshaken firmness, and the national superiority of the
British troops over those of other countries has been evinced in the
midst of the most imminent perils. History contains so many proofs
of extraordinary acts of bravery, that no doubts can be raised upon
the facts which are recorded. It must therefore be admitted, that the
distinguishing feature of the British soldier is INTREPIDITY. This
quality was evinced by the inhabitants of England when their country
was invaded by Julius Cæsar with a Roman army, on which occasion the
undaunted Britons rushed into the sea to attack the Roman soldiers as
they descended from their ships; and, although their discipline and
arms were inferior to those of their adversaries, yet their fierce and
dauntless bearing intimidated the flower of the Roman troops, including
Cæsar's favourite tenth legion. Their arms consisted of spears, short
swords, and other weapons of rude construction. They had chariots,
to the axles of which were fastened sharp pieces of iron resembling
scythe-blades, and infantry in long chariots resembling waggons,
who alighted and fought on foot, and for change of ground, pursuit,
or retreat, sprang into the chariot and drove off with the speed of
cavalry. These inventions were, however, unavailing against Cæsar's
legions: in the course of time a military system, with discipline
and subordination, was introduced, and British courage, being thus
regulated, was exerted to the greatest advantage; a full development of
the national character followed, and it shone forth in all its native
brilliancy.
The military force of the Anglo-Saxons consisted principally of
infantry: Thanes, and other men of property, however, fought on
horseback. The infantry were of two classes, heavy and light. The
former carried large shields armed with spikes, long broad swords and
spears; and the latter were armed with swords or spears only. They had
also men armed with clubs, others with battle-axes and javelins.
The feudal troops established by William the Conqueror, consisted (as
already stated in the Introduction to the Cavalry) almost entirely
of horse; but when the warlike barons and knights, with their trains
of tenants and vassals, took the field, a proportion of men appeared
on foot, and, although these were of inferior degree, they proved
stout-hearted Britons of stanch fidelity. When stipendiary troops were
employed, infantry always constituted a considerable portion of the
military force; and this _arme_ has since acquired, in every quarter
of the globe, a celebrity never exceeded by the armies of any nation at
any period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account