Historical Record of the Thirty-first, or, the Huntingdonshire Regiment of Foot;: containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1702, and of its subsequent services to 1850Cannon, Richard
History
Historical Record of the Thirty-first, or, the Huntingdonshire Regiment of Foot;: containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1702, and of its subsequent services to 1850
Cannon, Richard
Great Britain. Army -- History; Great Britain. Army. Regiment of Foot, 31st
Officers
and Men.
Lloyd’s Dragoons, now 3rd Light Dragoons (detachment.) 275
Foot Guards, the Grenadier and Coldstream 755
Sir H. Bellasis’s now 2nd Foot 834
Churchill’s 3rd ” 834
Seymour’s 4th ” 834
Columbine’s 6th ” 724
O’Hara’s, 3 companies 7th Royal Fusiliers 313
Erle’s 19th Foot 724
Gustavus Hamilton’s 20th ” 724
Villiers’s Marines, 5 Companies. 31st ” 520
Fox’s Marines 32nd ” 834
Donegal’s 35th ” 724
Charlemont’s 36th ” 724
Shannon’s Marines 834
----
9653
Dutch Regiments commanded by Major-General Baron }
Sparre and Brigadier Pallandt } 3924
------
13,577
Colonel Villiers’s Corps of Marines, now the THIRTY-FIRST regiment,
soon after its formation was thus called upon to supply five
Companies for embarkation for active service on board the fleet
destined against Spain: these Companies embarked in the latter
part of May from Plymouth, and proceeded to join the fleet at
Portsmouth, from whence the expedition sailed to Cadiz in the month
of July, 1702.
The armament appeared off Cadiz on the 12th of August, and the
Duke summoned the place; but his terms being refused, he landed on
the 15th at the Bay of Bulls, between Rota and Fort St. Catherine,
under great disadvantages and a well conducted opposition: he
marched upon Rota, where the horses and stores were disembarked,
and in two days afterwards he advanced to the town of St. Mary.
Rota was retaken by a _coup-de-main_, and the British garrison of
300 men was captured. The attempt on Cadiz failed; the troops were
re-embarked, and sailed from Cadiz on the 30th of September.
In alluding to this expedition, Bishop Burnet remarks,--“It is
certain our Court had false accounts of the state the place was in,
both with relation to the garrison, and to the fortifications; the
garrison was much stronger, and the fortifications were in a better
state, than was represented.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account