Historical Record of the Thirty-fourth, or the Cumberland Regiment of Foot: containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1702 and of its subsequent services to 1844Cannon, Richard
History
Historical Record of the Thirty-fourth, or the Cumberland Regiment of Foot: containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1702 and of its subsequent services to 1844
Cannon, Richard
Great Britain. Army -- History; Great Britain. Army. Infantry. 34th Regiment (Cumberland)
will doubt that their physical strength and moral courage are
superior to that of any other nation. It is all one to the British
soldier where his enemy may be,--whether in his front, flanks, or
rear,--he will fight him as long as his officer orders him, as at
Waterloo, where whole faces of the squares were swept away with
round shot, still the British soldier was found immovable. And
although you may characterise the British soldier as the lion in
the field, yet the most noble of all his traits, according to my
estimation, is his humanity after a battle, when the lion suddenly
changes to the lamb; and I never saw an instance in all my service
in which the British soldier committed an act of cruelty upon his
fallen enemy[17]. Next to the British soldier, I consider the
Russian the most formidable while placed in position, although he
cannot move[18]; and I may instance the fact in support of this,
that at the battle of Borodino, the redoubts were five times taken
by the French, and as often retaken by the Russians. Napoleon,
finding he could make no impression on their iron front, made a
flank movement with his army during the night, and got betwixt them
and Moscow. It is too much the idea amongst the continental armies,
that if their centre is pierced, or their flanks are turned, the
battle is lost, as at the unfortunate battle of Jena, which the
Prussians lost, and which decided the fate of their country. The
same may be said with regard to the Austrians, at the battles
of Wagram and Asperne, which led to the occupation of Vienna by
the French, and to peace. How widely different with the British
soldier! While in Paris, in the year 1815, I had many conversations
with French officers of high rank, who argued strongly, that by
all the laws of war, the English had lost the Battle of Waterloo,
as their centre had been pierced, their flanks turned, and their
artillery were in possession of the French. Could these gentlemen
have possibly paid a higher compliment to the British army,
although they wished to turn that compliment to their own account.
When Napoleon saw the English army drawn up in position for the
Battle of Waterloo, he remarked to Marshal Soult, “There are the
English, I have got them at last, and I think it is nine chances
out of ten that I have them all before night.” The Marshal, who had
had a great deal of experience of the English, while opposed to
them in Spain and in the South of France, replied to the Emperor,
“Your Majesty certainly sees the English army, but you will find
them like trees, rivetted to the ground.” I may here mention, in
confirmation of this, that when the Kremlin was re-occupied by
the Russians, the portfolio of Berthier, the War Minister, was
found, giving a return of the French army in Russia, amounting
to 400,000 infantry, and 80,000 cavalry. There were also found
secret reports from the French Marshals opposed to the English in
Spain, and addressed to Napoleon himself, stating that the French
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account