Historical sketches of the southRoche, Emma Langdon
History
Historical sketches of the south
Roche, Emma Langdon
Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- Alabama
This constitutional extension of the slave traffic closed
all possibility of the question ever being settled amicably.
Short-sightedness can scarcely be charged to those responsible, for at
that time there was no thought of an acquisition of territory on the
south and southwest, and the cultivation of cotton was still in its
infancy. Before another decade Eli Whitney had invented the cotton-gin;
this gave an impetus to the growing of cotton; agriculture in the
South was revolutionized. To make way for the industry Georgia ceded
her western territory to the United States and a tide of Southern
immigration from the older centers of Virginia and the Carolinas
rapidly flowed into Alabama and Mississippi. The wanderlust of a
hardy, pioneer ancestry was in these men’s veins. Accompanied often
by gentle families, their household goods, and their negroes they
started overland. By long and tedious journeyings, across mountain,
stream, and swamp--through seemingly boundless stretches of majestic
pines--sometimes encountering hostile Indians and again exchanging
friendly courtesies with the friendly Choctaws and Chickasaws, they
reached the new frontier, and established themselves along the river
courses. Others came by sailing vessels, and passing through the French
and Spanish cities of Pensacola, Mobile, and New Orleans, followed
the river courses into the interior. The log cabins which sprang up
in the wilderness, were soon supplanted by comfortable, substantial
homes frequently built of brick made upon the plantations or of
hand-hewn lumber; each became a nucleus of activities around which all
things necessary for the maintenance of life were produced. On the
well-ordered plantations the African was not only field laborer and
faithful domestic, but became cobbler, mason, carpenter, and a spinner
and weaver of cotton and wool. In this virgin region, far removed
from the life and influences of the older States, there grew up a
vital and mutual dependence between master and slave; as such, each
was necessary to the other; but it was not a combination out of which
sentiments for the ultimate freedom of the negro were apt to grow; and
it was these who were farthest removed from the later machinations
of the Abolitionists, who were most bitter and strenuous in their
opposition. In this close relation which in all but rare exceptions was
a kindly one, the Southerner came to know the negro as the negro then
could not know himself, realized his limitations, directed him along
useful lines, and knew how rapidly he would revert were the civilizing
and humanizing influence of slavery as it existed in the South removed.
In later years when Southerners stood before a questioning world, there
was no sophistry in the protests of those who declared that slavery was
beneficial, and it was an argument resting upon truth that the Southern
negro’s condition was happier than that of the laboring classes in
other parts of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account