Historical sketches of the southRoche, Emma Langdon
History
Historical sketches of the south
Roche, Emma Langdon
Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- Alabama
When New Jersey abolished slavery in 1804, this statute obtained in
all the Northern States. In their economy slavery was an incubus. This
statute imposed no financial sacrifice on individuals, for in most
cases the relatively few slaves had been transferred and sold in the
South. Though there were threatening party differences, as yet there
seems no general feeling against slavery in those States to which
it was peculiar, and such sentiments as were entertained were more
abstract than those common in the South itself.[13] Many Northern
fortunes had been built upon the slave trade; though prohibiting the
importation into their own States, numbers were still actively engaged
in the traffic--and the Southern States were the only ports legally
open to them, for an act forbidding the direct or indirect importation
of slaves into foreign countries had become a United States statute
in 1794. The South itself seldom engaged in this traffic--it was a
degradation to which her aristocratic tendencies could not stoop; a
“nigger-trade” was taboo; and though slave vessels plied to and from
her ports, they were usually a part of Yankee enterprise.
Jefferson, to whom the question had so long been a momentous one,
welcomed the time when the traffic would end, and in his sixth annual
message to Congress, December 2, 1806, rejoiced “on the approach of
the period at which you may interpose your authority constitutionally,
to withdraw the citizens of the United States from all further
participation in those violations of human rights which have so long
continued on the unoffending inhabitants of Africa, and which the
morality, the reputation, and the best interests of the country have
long been eager to proscribe.” With the first of January, 1808, it
became unlawful for any person of color to be imported into the United
States or her territory; any person aiding or abetting such traffic to
be fined five thousand dollars; also “any citizen of the United States,
building, fitting out, equipping, loading or otherwise preparing
or sending away any ship or vessel, knowing that the same shall be
employed in such trade or business” shall pay twenty thousand dollars,
a part to go to the United States and another to any person or persons
who shall prosecute the offender. Every vessel found engaged in the
traffic was to be “seized, prosecuted, and condemned in any of the
circuit courts or district courts where the said ship or vessel may
be found or seized.” The President was authorized to use the naval
and revenue forces to enforce the statute. They were to cruise on the
coast of the United States and her territories; to seize and bring to
port vessels contravening the provisions of the act, the captain or
commander to be prosecuted before any court of the United States having
jurisdiction thereof; and if convicted to be fined not more than ten
thousand dollars, and to be subject to imprisonment to not more than
four years.[14]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account