Historical sketches of the southRoche, Emma Langdon
History
Historical sketches of the south
Roche, Emma Langdon
Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- Alabama
Lord Aberdeen in his correspondence with Mr. Stephenson (Oct. 13,
1841) had admitted that it would be an infringement of public law,
to visit and search American vessels during times of peace, if that
right were not granted by treaty. “But no such right is asserted. We
sincerely desire to respect the vessels of the United States, but we
may reasonably expect to know what it is we respect. Doubtless the flag
is prima facie evidence of nationality of the vessel; and, if this
evidence were in its nature conclusive and irrefragible, it ought to
preclude all further inquiry. But it is sufficiently notorious that
the flags of all nations are liable to be assumed by those who have no
right or title to bear them. Mr. Stephenson himself fully admits the
extent to which the American flag has been employed for the purpose
of covering this infamous traffic. The undersigned joins with Mr.
Stephenson in deeply lamenting the evil; and he agrees with him in
thinking the United States ought not to be considered responsible for
the abuse of their flag. But if all inquiry be resisted, even when
carried no further than to ascertain the nationality of the vessel, and
impunity be claimed for the most lawless and desperate of mankind,
in the commission of the fraud the undersigned greatly fears that it
may be regarded as something like an assumption of that responsibility
which has been deprecated by Mr. Stephenson....
“The undersigned, although with pain, must add, that if such visit lead
to the proof of the American origin of the vessel, and that she was
avowedly engaged in the trade, exhibiting manacles, fetters, and other
usual implements of torture, or had even a number of those unfortunates
on board, no British officer could interfere further. He might give
information to the cruisers of the United States, but it could not be
in his power to arrest or impede the prosecution of the voyage and the
success of the undertaking.”
The question called for a diplomatic correspondence. In 1842, Lord
Ashburton was sent as special minister to the United States, empowered
to settle the Northwest Boundary, and other questions of controversy.
The result of his conference with Daniel Webster, Secretary of State,
was a treaty between Great Britain and the United States known as the
Ashburton Treaty and as the Treaty of Washington. By the eighth article
each stipulated to “maintain on the African coast an adequate squadron,
to carry in all not less than eighty guns, to enforce separately and
respectively the laws, rights, and obligations of the two countries for
the suppression of the slave trade.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account