Historical sketches of the southRoche, Emma Langdon
History
Historical sketches of the south
Roche, Emma Langdon
Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- Alabama
The Tarkar village was situated many miles inland. Poleete, one of
the old survivors, says it was “many days from the water,” meaning
thereby the sea. They were a peace-loving, agricultural people,
raising hogs, sheep, and cows, and planting corn, beans, and yams.
Their chief industry was the production of palm oil. Nature had been
lavish--the lands were wonderfully fertile, requiring little work and
no fertilizer; the fragrance of ripening fruits filled the forests.
The Tarkar dwellings were of superior quality and had the advantage of
withstanding fire. They were built of mud; the process of construction
has been described by two of the survivors--Poleete and Kazoola. First
a circular trench was dug and a wall of mud four feet high and a foot
and a half thick laid; this was left until thoroughly dry. Another four
feet was laid upon this, which was also left to dry. Then a third layer
of four feet was laid making their dwellings about twelve feet high.
When thoroughly dry, branches were cut, the roof thatched and covered
with mud.
The Tarkars were not without laws, and had a sort of court of justice
over which the King presided. Each of the old survivors lays especial
stress upon honesty as a tribal characteristic. Stealing was almost
unknown; all worked and had what was needed; houses were never locked
and possessions seldom disturbed. All an individual’s wealth “might be
hung upon a tree or accidentally left--others of the tribe knew they
had not put it there--that it was not theirs--so disturbed it not.”
“Suppose I had left my purse in town in the public square. To-day I
have not the time to go for it--nor to-morrow--am I worried? No, for
I know when I go I will find it where I left it. Could you do that in
America?” (Kazoola). As there was no reason or excuse for stealing,
when one among them committed a theft, it was more through a spirit of
braggadocio. The culprit would be taken before the King who would say,
“You are strong--you have two arms to work--you suffer for nothing--why
have you stolen?” The defendant would be imprisoned, and the Tarkars
say that if he lived to get out he would steal no more.
Death was always meted to the murderer--rank having no weight with
justice. Poleete explained that if the King’s son committed murder,
death would fall to him as to the commoner. “Money don’t plea you
there” (Poleete). The manner of execution was decapitation--the
implement a sword. To illustrate the inexorable nature of their laws,
the following was narrated by Kazoola: “The Law in Tarkar. If it would
be my son. He kills a man. I have money--I want to buy my son. I go
before the King, and say ‘Oh, King, my son has killed, but I have
money.’ The King would reply, ‘Here is the Law, read.’ I read and say,
‘Yes, King, the Law says Death.’ And the King would answer, ‘That is
the Law, and I am the King. Shut your eyes, give up your son--money
cannot buy.’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account