History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economy — John Shaqi
History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economyWhitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
History
History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economy
Whitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
Economics -- Great Britain -- History; Labor theory of value -- Great Britain -- History
6. We need now the proof of this interpretation. The opening sentence of
the chapter on natural and market price proceeds as follows:
“In making labour the foundation of the value of commodities,
and the comparative quantity of labour which is necessary to
their production the rule which determines the respective
quantities of goods which shall be given in exchange for
each other, we must not be supposed to deny the accidental
and temporary deviations of the actual or market price of
commodities from _this, their primary and natural price_.”[59]
This sentence seems to state that the labor cost of a commodity is its
“natural price.” If so, the statement is due to the influence of the
philosophical account; but it is an absurdity in this connection. Actual
market-price does not deviate temporarily from _labor cost_. Normal
value is not an amount of labor, nor can it be spoken of as equal to an
amount of labor. The passage is a careless way of saying that the normal
values of goods are _in proportion to_ their labor costs. Ricardo’s real
conception of normal value is this: The total labor cost of a commodity
determines the total wages charges that must be paid by the entrepreneur,
or series of entrepreneurs producing it. Competition tends to give the
entrepreneurs producing different commodities equal rates of “profits”
upon these outlays. Therefore the normal exchange value of a commodity is
composed of a sum of wages costs (due to the nature of the commodity as
requiring such and such an amount of labor to produce it), which is the
independent determining element, and a sum of interest which is merely
a uniform rate upon the wages cost. It is in this way that labor cost
regulates value, _according to an empirical account_.[60]
To substantiate this view of Ricardo’s meaning, we can quote the
following:
“Mr. Malthus appears to think that it is a part of my doctrine
that the cost and value of a thing should be the same;—it
is, if he means by cost, ‘cost of production’ including
profits.”[61]
The only kind of cost that includes “profits” (_i. e._, interest) is
entrepreneur’s cost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account