History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of moralsMyers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Philosophy
History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of morals
Myers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Ethics -- History
[230] _Laws of Manu_ (Sacred Books of the East, vol. xxv), i. 31, 87.
[231] Cf. Hearn, _Kokora_, chap. xii.
[232] _Laws of Manu_, vi. 63.
[233] _Ibid._ xii. 9, 53–58. The germs out of which this system was
developed by the Brahmans formed a part of the animistic conception of
the world held by the conquered natives. By the sixth century B.C. the
system had been fully elaborated. See Rhys Davids, _Hibbert Lectures_
(1881), pp. 16 f.
[234] The theory was also undoubtedly in part the creation of the same
ethical necessity that called into existence the purgatory of the
medieval Church. The reincarnations have for aim and purpose not merely
retribution, but expiation and purification.
[235] The reader of Edward Beecher’s _The Conflict of Ages_, wherein
the author attempts to explain the inequalities of earthly life by
the theory of preëxistence, will be able to appreciate this effort of
Indian philosophers to solve the same problem.
[236] Indian pessimism is doubtless to be attributed in part to the
hot, depressing climate, but more largely to the burdensome caste
system and an oppressive government, which made free and joyous life
impossible to the masses, shutting them up, without hope, to an
existence of ache and pain and wretchedness. “Politics and society,
in our opinion,” says Dr. Hopkins, “had more to do with altering the
religion of India than had a higher temperature and miasma” (_The
Religions of India_ (1895), p. 199). But cf. Bloomfield, _The Religion
of the Veda_ (1908), pp. 263 ff.
[237] Hopkins, _The Religions of India_ (1895), p. 149.
[238] _Ibid._ p. 187.
[239] This Brahmanic notion of sacrifice, that the gods need food,
is the underlying notion in all religions of which sacrifices form
a part. “That the purpose of sacrifice was simply to feed the gods
was admitted on all sides in the controversy which accompanied the
diffusion of Christianity in the ancient world.... The altar, in the
words of Dean Spenser, was merely the table on which food and drink
were set before the languishing deity” (Payne, _History of the New
World called America_ (1892), vol. i, pp. xi f.). “It is on precisely
the same principle that the Mexicans kept their great war-gods ...
alive and vigorous by the blood of young human victims selected from
their tributaries, and the Peruvians maintained the Creator, Sun, Moon,
and Thunder, on whose favor their crops depended, in youth and vigor by
the continual smoke of burnt llamas” (_Ibid._ vol. i, p. 484). Consult
also Frazer, _Adonis, Attis, and Osiris_. All these were divinities of
vegetation, which were believed to die and to come to life again, as
with the revolution of the seasons vegetation died and was renewed.
Along with this belief went the notion that by magical ceremonies
the worshipers of the gods could aid them in recovering their wasted
energies.
[240] _Laws of Manu_, i. 88–91.
[241] _Ibid._ i. 93.
[242] _Ibid._ ii. 32, 35.
[243] _The Gentoo Code_ (1776), xvi. 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account