History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of moralsMyers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Philosophy
History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of morals
Myers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Ethics -- History
And preëminently the same is it with religion. Religion has been a
great part of the life of man, and the historian of morals must be a
diligent student of the religious systems of the world, but mainly
because religion has been in general such a potent agency in the moral
education of mankind. For it is the ethical factor in the great world
religions which constitutes their universal and permanent element.
“It is the function of religion to kindle moral enthusiasm in society
at large.”[4] “Christianity has no other function or value than as an
aid to morality.”[5] All the great religions of the world--Buddhism,
Confucianism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism (reckoning historic Judaism as
beginning with the great prophets of the ninth and eighth centuries
B.C.), Christianity, and Islam--began as moral reforms.[6]
In short, in the words of Wellhausen, “Morality is that for the sake of
which all other things exist; it is the alone essential thing in the
world.”[7] The really constructive and regulative forces in history are
in truth moral ideas and convictions. And there is vast significance
in this--that the ethical motive, never absent and always active, is
constantly becoming more and more dominant in the processes of the
historical evolution. As the ages pass there enters into history--we
shall see this to be so later--an ever larger ethical element.
Conscience becomes ever more and more involved in the personal,
national, and international affairs of the world.
[Sidenote: The history of morals
in the main a record of the
expansion of the circle covered by
the moral feelings]
Moral progress consists not so much in changes in the quality or
intensity of the moral emotions, although these gain in diversity,
purity, and refinement as time passes, as in the successive
enlargements of the circle of persons embraced by the moral
feelings.[8] “It is not the sense of duty to a neighbor, but the
practical answer to the question, Who is my neighbor? that has
varied.”[9] As we shall see when we come to examine the morality of
primitive man, the moral feelings embrace at first only kinsmen, that
is, the members of one’s own family, clan, or social group. All others
are outside the moral pale. But gradually this circle grows larger and
embraces in successive expansions the tribe, the city, the nation, and
lastly humanity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account