History of American SocialismsNoyes, John Humphrey
History
History of American Socialisms
Noyes, John Humphrey
Communism -- United States; Socialism -- United States
"In the summer and fall of 1849 it became evident that a
dissolution and division was inevitable, and plans for doing it
within themselves, without recourse to courts of law, were
finally got up, and they determined to have it done by their
legal advisers as other business was done. At the annual
election in December 1849, the officers were elected with a view
to that particular business. They had already sold much of the
personal property and cancelled much of the stock. The highest
amount of stock ever issued was about $33,000, and this was
reduced by the sale of personal property up to January 1850, to
about $23,000; soon after which the charter was amended,
allowing the sale of real estate and the discontinuance of
annual settlement, schools, etc.
"In April 1850 they fixed on an appraisal of their lands in
small lots (having some of them cut into village and farm lots),
and commenced selling at public sale for stock, making the
appraisal the minimum, and leaving any lands open to entry,
after they had been offered publicly. During the summer of 1850
most of the lands were sold and most of the stock cancelled in
this way, under an arrangement by which each stockholder should
receive his proportional share of any surplus, or make up any
deficiency. Most of the members bought either farming lands or
village lots and became permanent inhabitants, thus continuing
the society and its influences to a considerable extent. They
divided about eight per cent. above par on the stock.
"Thus commenced, flourished and decayed this attempt at
industrial Association. It never attempted to follow Fourier or
any other teacher, but rather to strike out a path for itself.
It failed because its leading minds became satisfied that under
existing circumstances no important progress could be made,
rather than from a want of faith in the ultimate practicability
of Association.
"Many of the members regretted the dissolution, while others who
had gained property and become established in business through
the reputation of the Phalanx for credit and punctuality, seemed
to care very little about it. Being absorbed in the world-wide
spirit of speculation, and having their minds thus occupied,
they forgot the necessity for a social change, which once
appeared to them so important."
The writer of the foregoing was probably one of the leading members.
In a paragraph preceding the account he says that the Wisconsin
Phalanx had these three peculiarities, viz:
"1. The same individual who was the principal originator and organizer
of it, was also the one, who, throughout the experiment, had the
entire confidence of the members and stockholders; and finally did
nearly all the business in the closing up of its affairs.
"2. At the division of its property, it paid a premium on its stock,
instead of sustaining a loss.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account