Tycho Brahe was able to correct the lunar theory by his observations.
Copernicus had introduced two epicycles on the lunar orbit in the hope
of obtaining a better accordance between theory and observation; and he
was not too ambitious, as his desire was to get the tables accurate to
ten minutes. Tycho Brahe found that the tables of Copernicus were in
error as much as two degrees. He re-discovered the inequality called
“variation” by observing the moon in all phases—a thing which had not
been attended to. [It is remarkable that in the nineteenth century Sir
George Airy established an altazimuth at Greenwich Observatory with
this special object, to get observations of the moon in all phases.] He
also discovered other lunar equalities, and wanted to add another
epicycle to the moon’s orbit, but he feared that these would soon
become unmanageable if further observations showed more new
inequalities.
But, as it turned out, the most fruitful work of Tycho Brahe was on the
motions of the planets, and especially of the planet Mars, for it was
by an examination of these results that Kepler was led to the discovery
of his immortal laws.
After the death of King Frederick the observatories of Tycho Brahe were
not supported. The gigantic power and industry displayed by this
determined man were accompanied, as often happens, by an overbearing
manner, intolerant of obstacles. This led to friction, and eventually
the observatories were dismantled, and Tycho Brahe was received by the
Emperor Rudolph II., who placed a house in Prague at his disposal. Here
he worked for a few years, with Kepler as one of his assistants, and he
died in the year 1601.
It is an interesting fact that Tycho Brahe had a firm conviction that
mundane events could be predicted by astrology, and that this belief
was supported by his own predictions.
It has already been stated that Tycho Brahe maintained that observation
must precede theory. He did not accept the Copernican theory that the
earth moves, but for a working hypothesis he used a modification of an
old Egyptian theory, mathematically identical with that of Copernicus,
but not involving a stellar parallax. He says (_De Mundi_, _etc_.) that
the Ptolemean system was too complicated, and the new one which that
great man Copernicus had proposed, following in the footsteps of
Aristarchus of Samos, though there was nothing in it contrary to
mathematical principles, was in opposition to those of physics, as the
heavy and sluggish earth is unfit to move, and the system is even
opposed to the authority of Scripture. The absence of annual parallax
further involves an incredible distance between the outermost planet
and the fixed stars.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account