But Kepler saw much farther than the geometrical facts. He realised
that the orbits are followed owing to a force directed to the sun; and
he guessed that this is the same force as the gravity that makes a
stone fall. He saw the difficulty of gravitation acting through the
void space. He compared universal gravitation to magnetism, and speaks
of the work of Gilbert of Colchester. (Gilbert’s book, _De Mundo Nostro
Sublunari, Philosophia Nova_, Amstelodami, 1651, containing similar
views, was published forty-eight years after Gilbert’s death, and
forty-two years after Kepler’s book and reference. His book _De
Magnete_ was published in 1600.)
A few of Kepler’s views on gravitation, extracted from the Introduction
to his _Astronomia Nova_, may now be mentioned:—
1. Every body at rest remains at rest if outside the attractive power
of other bodies.
2. Gravity is a property of masses mutually attracting in such manner
that the earth attracts a stone much more than a stone attracts the
earth.
3. Bodies are attracted to the earth’s centre, not because it is the
centre of the universe, but because it is the centre of the attracting
particles of the earth.
4. If the earth be not round (but spheroidal?), then bodies at
different latitudes will not be attracted to its centre, but to
different points in the neighbourhood of that centre.
5. If the earth and moon were not retained in their orbits by vital
force (_aut alia aligua aequipollenti_), the earth and moon would come
together.
6. If the earth were to cease to attract its waters, the oceans would
all rise and flow to the moon.
7. He attributes the tides to lunar attraction. Kepler had been
appointed Imperial Astronomer with a handsome salary (on paper), a
fraction of which was doled out to him very irregularly. He was led to
miserable makeshifts to earn enough to keep his family from starvation;
and proceeded to Ratisbon in 1630 to represent his claims to the Diet.
He arrived worn out and debilitated; he failed in his appeal, and died
from fever, contracted under, and fed upon, disappointment and
exhaustion. Those were not the days when men could adopt as a
profession the “research of endowment.”
Before taking leave of Kepler, who was by no means a man of one idea,
it ought to be here recorded that he was the first to suggest that a
telescope made with both lenses convex (not a Galilean telescope) can
have cross wires in the focus, for use as a pointer to fix accurately
the positions of stars. An Englishman, Gascoigne, was the first to use
this in practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account