Sprengel in enunciating his own theory of cell-formation accused
Mirbel of mistaking the starch-grains in the cells for the pores of
the cell-walls. On this point, so important in the doctrine of the
cell and in physiology, he was followed by the three candidates for
the Göttingen prize, though Bernhardi had in 1805 defended Mirbel’s
view, and had pointed out how little likely it was, that so skilful
an observer as Mirbel should fall into so gross an error. BERNHARDI’S
short treatise, ‘Beobachtungen über Pflanzengefässe,’ Erfurt
(1805[73]), was in general distinguished by a variety of new and
correct observations, and was the work of a simple and straightforward
understanding, which takes things as they are presented to the eye
without allowing itself to be led astray by preconceived opinions. His
observations are certainly the best in the whole period from Malpighi
and Grew to the younger Moldenhawer; his method of dealing with
questions of phytotomy is much more to the purpose than that of the
three rivals for the Göttingen prize.
In the work just mentioned Bernhardi treats of other forms of tissue as
well as vessels, and endeavours to distinguish and classify them more
exactly than had hitherto been done. He contrasts favourably with his
contemporaries in the fact, that he sought to define the histological
terms employed as precisely as possible,—a great step in advance at a
time when phytotomic conceptions were in a very misty condition. He
distinguishes three chief forms of vegetable tissue, pith, bast, and
vessels.
By pith he means the tissue which Grew had named parenchyma, and
which is still so called; it remained a question with him whether the
cells of the pith are pierced by visible pores. By the word bast he
understood not only the fibrous elements of the rind, but those of the
wood also, and in general what is now known as prosenchyma; this agrees
very well with Malpighi’s view, which was adopted by Bernhardi and by
all his contemporaries, that the inner layers of the bast are changed
into the exterior layers of wood to make the increase in thickness of
the woody stem; but he did not admit the same origin in the case of the
innermost portion of the wood, for this is formed from the first in the
young shoots, which alone contain true spiral vessels with threads that
may be wound off.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account