4. The views of phytotomists on the so-called intercellular substance
during the twenty years from 1836 to 1856 were closely connected with
the older theories of cell-formation, but were opposed to the modern
doctrine of the cell founded by Nägeli in 1846. Von Mohl himself had
introduced this idea for the first time into the science in 1836 in
one of his earlier and inferior essays, ‘Erläuterung meiner Ansicht
von der Structur der Pflanzensubstanz,’ rather in opposition to than
in connection with his own theory of the growth and structure of
cell-walls. Setting out from modes of formation of cell-membranes
in some Algae, difficult to understand and in some respects quite
peculiar, von Mohl believed that he saw in many cases in the higher
plants also between the sharply-defined membranes, which bound the
cell-spaces and which he regarded as the entire cell-membranes, a
substance in which the cells are imbedded, for such is its appearance
when it is largely developed; when it lies in small quantity only
between cells in close apposition, it looks like a thin layer of
cement. After Meyen in his ‘Neues System,’ pp. 162, 174 had declared
against this view in 1837, von Mohl too abandoned it more and more,
and afterwards limited the occurrence of intercellular substance to
certain cases, being convinced that much that he had before taken for
it consisted only of layers of secondary thickening, between which
he still saw the primary lamina of the cell-membrane. The theory of
intercellular substance was taken up and further developed by other
phytotomists, by Unger especially in the Botanische Zeitung for 1847,
p. 289, and afterwards chiefly by Schacht; Wigand came forward as an
opponent of it in 1854 in his ‘Botanische Untersuchungen,’ p. 65, and
logically following out von Mohl’s theory of the cell-membrane declared
the thin layers of intercellular substance as well as the cuticle,
which had been first correctly distinguished by von Mohl, to be laminae
of primary cell-membrane, the substance of which had undergone profound
chemical change. These ideas also of the intercellular substance and
the cuticle assumed an entirely different aspect when Nägeli introduced
his theory of intussusception.
The limits imposed on this history render it necessary to be content
with these indications of von Mohl’s share in the working out of the
theory of cells in its connection with the structure of the solid
framework of cell-membrane; we shall return again to his observations
on the formation of individual cells.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account