Meyen next, relying on von Mohl’s observations on Cladophora, declared
in the second volume of his ‘Neues System’ that cell-division was a
very common occurrence in Algae, Filamentous Fungi and the Characeae,
but he neglected any closer investigation of the processes by which
the division is introduced and completed. His comparison of these
cases of cell-formation with the formation of spores, pollen-grains,
and endosperm-cells is moreover noticeable as the first attempt
to distinguish what is now known as free cell-formation from
cell-division; it was obviously the want of this distinction which long
prevented clearer views on the whole of this field of observation.
The due separation of these two modes of cell-formation was a short
step after the observations that had been already made; and if that
step had been taken, Schleiden’s theory would have been impossible,
and the development of the cell-theory would not have been prejudiced
by the mistake, introduced by Schleiden after 1838, of applying the
mode of free cell-formation, which he believed he had observed in the
embryo-sac of Phanerogams, to the multiplication of vegetative cells in
growing organs, and regarding it as the only mode of cell-formation.
This would have been the more impossible, since von Mohl in the same
year gave an excellent description of the development of stomata by
division of a young epidermis-cell and the later separation of the
dividing wall into two laminae. But von Mohl in the years immediately
following was over-cautious in refraining from all speculative
consideration of cases that lay clearly before him, and his views
were still undecided in 1845, when Unger and Nägeli had already made
good observations on the formation of tissue-cells in growing organs
(‘Vermischte Schriften,’ 1845, p. 336).
Schleiden’s theory of cell-formation arose out of a curious mixing
together of obscure observations and preconceived opinions, and reminds
us indeed strongly of the old notions of Sprengel and Treviranus; it is
true that he distinctly rejected their views, but he too made new cells
arise from very minute granules, and his theory like theirs did not
rest on any thorough course of observation.
Robert Brown, (see his Miscellaneous Writings, edited by T. T. Bennett,
I.) had discovered the nucleus in the cells of the epidermis of
Orchidaceous plants in 1831, and had shown that it was very generally
present in the tissue-cells of Phanerogams, but had obtained no results
from his discovery. The cell-nucleus lay undisturbed, till Schleiden
suddenly made it the soul of his theory and the starting-point of all
cell-formation. He considered that the nucleus was formed from the
mucilaginous content of the cell, which he assumed on insufficient
grounds to be of the nature of gum; this he called the cytoblastem, and
the nucleus itself the cytoblast. As he states that his cytoblastem
becomes yellow and granular in solutions of iodine, we may recognise in
it our own protoplasm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account