History of Central America, Volume 3, 1801-1887: The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 8Bancroft, Hubert Howe
History
History of Central America, Volume 3, 1801-1887: The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 8
Bancroft, Hubert Howe
Central America -- History
A period of reaction, or restoration as it was properly called, was now
inaugurated. During several years the servile party had held undisputed
control of public affairs in Guatemala, crushing out all opposition
to the best of its ability. Its policy had been one of intolerance,
and its downfall was hailed with joy. Morazan seemed to have been
chosen by providence to inflict condign punishment on those who had
so cruelly exercised a usurped power. Surrounded as he was by so many
diverse elements, the severity of the blows he dealt must not be all
laid to his account. The state assembly, which had been dissolved in
1826, having again met on the 21st of April, 1829,[V-86] with its old
president, Nicolás Espinosa, was practically a tool in the hands of
the victorious general, and enacted several vigorous laws against the
vanquished party.[V-87] On the 4th of June the assembly passed an act,
which was sanctioned by the consejo representativo on the 12th, and by
Jefe Barrundia on the 13th, declaring null all elections made pursuant
to the unconstitutional decree of the president of the republic
dated October 31, 1826, and the subsequent ones of 1827 and 1828. It
furthermore stamped as revolutionists and usurpers all persons who by
virtue of those decrees had obtained and held office of the federation
or the state of Guatemala, and as such guilty of high treason, and
amenable to the death penalty.[V-88] On the same day was issued a
so-called amnesty law; but the number of exemptions from its benefits
made its name a piece of irony.[V-89] The position of the prisoners
taken in Guatemala at the time of the capture of said city, and others,
became a more complicated one, in consequence of a decree passed by the
assembly of Salvador on the 9th of June, declaring that it would not
recognize in the assembly of Guatemala any authority to grant, without
the assent of the other states, amnesty to the factious disturbers of
public order; and that the capitulation entered into between Morazan
and Aycinena having been annulled, the captives were really prisoners
of war of the allied states.[V-90] A number of the prisoners were,
however, permitted to go into exile within fifteen days, paying
first the expenses of their support while in prison, and one third
of the value of their estates[V-91] into the federal treasury, as
indemnification for the damages they had inflicted on the country. That
privilege was not granted to the president and vice-president and their
ministers, the former chief of Guatemala, and others. In fact, it was
a proscription of all the principal men who had sided with the servile
party.[V-92] It was also decreed that all salaries paid from October
1826 to April 1829 should be refunded. Harsh measures were used to
force a compliance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account