History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2): From the earliest time to the middle of the nineteenth centuryThorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
History
History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2): From the earliest time to the middle of the nineteenth century
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Chemistry -- History
Although we have cited the ancient Egyptians as practising the chemical
arts, there is no proof that these arts actually originated with them.
China, India, Chaldæa have each in turn been regarded as the birthplace
of the various technical processes from which chemistry may be said to
have taken its rise. Nevertheless, it is mainly from Egyptian records,
or from writings avowedly based on information from Egyptian sources,
that such knowledge as we possess of the earliest chemical processes is
derived. It is significant that the word “chemistry” has its origin in
_chemi_, “the black land,” the ancient name for Egypt. The art itself
was constantly spoken of as the “Egyptian art.”
“The word _chemistry_,” says Boerhaave in the Prolegomena of his _New
Method of Chemistry_ (Shaw and Chambers’s translation, London, 1727),
in _Greek_ should be wrote χημíα, and in _Latin_ and _English_
_chemia_ and _chemistry_; not as usual, _chymia_ and _chymistry_.
The first author in whom the word is found is _Plutarch_, who
lived under the Emperors _Domitian_, _Nerva_, and _Trajan_. That
philosopher, in his treatise of _Isis_ and _Osiris_, takes occasion
to observe that _Egypt, in the sacred dialect of the country, was
called by the same name as the_ black _of the eye_—viz., χημíα—by
which he seems to intimate that the word _chemia_ in the _Egyptian_
language signified black, and that the country, _Egypt_, might take
its denomination from the _blackness_ of the soil.
But [continues Boerhaave] the etymology and grammatical
signification of the name is not so easily dispatched. The critics
and antiquaries, among whom it has been a great subject of inquiry,
will not let it pass without some further disquisition. Instead of
_black_, some will have it originally denote _secret_, or _occult_;
and hence derive it from the _Hebrew_ _chaman_, or _haman_—a
_mystery_, whose radix is _cham_. And, accordingly, _Plutarch_
observes that _Egypt_, in the same sacred dialect, is sometimes
wrote in _Greek_ χαμíα—_chamia_; whence the word is easily deduced
further from _Cham_, eldest son of Noah, by whom Egypt was first
peopled after the deluge, and from whom, in the Scripture style,
it is called the _land of Cham_, or _Chem_. Now, that _chaman_,
or _haman_, properly signifies _secret_ appears from the same
_Plutarch_, who, mentioning an ancient author named _Menethes
Sibonita_, who had asserted that _Ammon_ and _Hammon_ were used
to denote the god of _Egypt_, _Plutarch_ takes this occasion to
observe that in the _Egyptian_ language anything secret or occult
was called by the same name, ἅμμον—_Hammon_.... Lastly, the learned
_Bochart_, keeping to the same sense of the word, chooses to derive
it from the _Arabic_ _chema_, or _kema_—to _hide_; adding that
there is an _Arabic_ book of secrets called by the same name _Kemi_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account