History of circumcision from the earliest times to the present : $b Moral and physical reasons for its performance, with a history of eunuchism, hermaphrodism, etc., and of the different operations practiced upon the prepuceRemondino, P. C. (Peter Charles)
Religion
History of circumcision from the earliest times to the present : $b Moral and physical reasons for its performance, with a history of eunuchism, hermaphrodism, etc., and of the different operations practiced upon the prepuce
Remondino, P. C. (Peter Charles)
Circumcision
[60] Among the Semitic race, however, it seems possible to bring
forward better evidence than this of an early Stone Age. If we
follow one way of translating we find, in two passages of the
Old Testament, an account of the use of sharp stones or stone
knives for circumcision,--Exodus, iv, 25: "And Zipporah took a
stone"; and Joshua, v, 2: "At that time Jehovah said to
Joshua, Make thee knives of stone." ... The Septuagint
altogether favors the opinion that the knives in question were
of stone, by reading, in the first place, a stone or pebble,
and, in the second, stone knives of sharp-cut stone. These are
mentioned again in the remarkable passage which follows the
account of the death and burial of Joshua (Joshua, xxiv, 29,
30),--"And it came to pass, after these things, that Joshua,
the son of Nun, the servant of Jehovah, died, being a hundred
and ten years old, and they buried him in the border of his
inheritance in Timnath Serah, which is in Mount Ephraim, on
the north side of the hill of Gaash." Here follows, in the
LXX, a passage not in the Hebrew text, which has come down to
us: "And there they laid with him in the tomb, wherein they
buried him there, the stone knives wherewith he circumcised
the children of Israel at the Gilgals, when he led them out of
Egypt, as the Lord commanded. And they are there unto this
day." The rabbinical law, in connection with this subject,
reads as follows: "We may circumcise with anything, even with
a flint, with crystal (glass), or with anything that cuts,
except with the sharp edge of a reed, because enchanters made
use of that, or it may bring on a disease; and it is a
precept of the wise men to circumcise with iron, whether in
the form of a knife or scissors, but it is customary to use a
knife." This mention of the objectionable nature of the reed
as a circumcising medium is attributed to the danger that may
arise from splinters. The Fiji Islanders use both a rattan
knife and a sharp splinter of bamboo in performing
circumcision and in cutting the umbilical cord at child-birth.
Herodotus mentions the use of stone knives by the Egyptian
embalmers. Stone knives were supposed to produce less
inflammation than those of bronze or iron, and it was for this
reason that the Cybelian priests operated upon themselves with
a sherd of Samian ware (Samia testa), as thus avoiding danger.
There seems, on the whole, to be a fair case for believing
that among the Israelites, as in Arabia, Ethiopia, and Egypt,
a ceremonial use of stone instruments long survived the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account