History of Embalming: and of Preparations in Anatomy, Pathology, and Natural History; Including an Account of a New Process for EmbalmingGannal, J.-N. (Jean-Nicolas)
History
History of Embalming: and of Preparations in Anatomy, Pathology, and Natural History; Including an Account of a New Process for Embalming
Gannal, J.-N. (Jean-Nicolas)
Anatomical specimens -- Collection and preservation; Embalming -- History; Mummies
The opinion of Volney, revived and adopted by Pariset, in his memoir
on the causes of the plague, is closely allied to the preceding. “In
a numerous population, under a burning climate, and a soil profoundly
drenched during many months of the year, the rapid putrefaction of
bodies is a leaven for plague and disease. Stricken by these murderous
pests, Egypt, at an early day, struggled to obviate them; hence have
arisen, on the one hand, the custom of burying their dead at a distance
from their habitations; and on the other, an art so ingenious and
simple, to prevent putrefaction by embalming: a secondary precaution,
more important and more efficacious, with which the primary could not
dispense, and which, exacting attempts, trials, and experiments, could
only be obtained as a last result--an art by no means expensive, of
a simplicity and facility of execution, which rendered its immediate
application popular, general, and, perhaps, uniform for all dead
bodies. Research and luxury followed at a later period.” The sentiments
to which the authors above cited attribute the origin of embalming
among the Egyptians exist in every man, viewed either as a social or
isolated being. One individual may be induced to embalm the bodies
of his relatives or friends by motives of superstition; another from
egotism or personal interest; a third from motives of salubrity or
common interest; another, in fine, is impelled by an instinctive
affection to perform the sacred duty of preserving the remains of those
who were dear to him. But none of these motives possess a character
of generality and perpetuity, which consecrates a usage and renders it
popular; it was therefore left to government to interfere and give it
the force of law.
The noble sentiments of affection, of respect, and of veneration, had
then, without doubt, the priority; and everything proves to us that
these inspired the admirable art of embalming, and that they were above
all invoked by legislators.
Nature, besides, upon this torrid soil, gave the first idea of this
mode of preserving the remains of men and animals: the mummy[1] of
the sands, a natural phenomenon, was a revelation to a people so wise
and industrious. The course of our work will demonstrate, we hope,
the simple connection of these facts; it had already arrested M. le
Comte de Caylus, who, in a memoir read to the Academy of Inscriptions
and Belles-Lettres, in 1749, thus expresses himself: “The Egyptians,
according to appearances, owe the idea of their mummies, to the dead
bodies which they found buried in the burning sands which prevail
in some parts of Egypt, and which, carried away by the winds, bury
travellers and preserve their bodies, by consuming the fat and flesh
without altering the skin.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account