History of Embalming: and of Preparations in Anatomy, Pathology, and Natural History; Including an Account of a New Process for EmbalmingGannal, J.-N. (Jean-Nicolas)
History
History of Embalming: and of Preparations in Anatomy, Pathology, and Natural History; Including an Account of a New Process for Embalming
Gannal, J.-N. (Jean-Nicolas)
Anatomical specimens -- Collection and preservation; Embalming -- History; Mummies
MESSIEURS,--If anatomy is the basis of all sound medical study, if
almost all those who have most contributed to the progress of medicine
and surgery have been skilful anatomists, it is rendering a great
service to those same sciences and to humanity, to discover a method of
facilitating the study of anatomy, and obviating its insalubrity. Well,
gentlemen, it is a discovery of this kind that M. Gannal presumes he
has made.
By a letter dated on the 10th of March, 1835, addressed to the Academy
of Medicine, by M. the Minister of Commerce, this learned body is
charged to make known to superior authority its opinion of the real
merit of the process of M. Gannal, for the preservation of dead bodies.
In consequence, the Academy has appointed a commission composed of MM.
Sanson, Roux, Dizè, Guèneau de Mussy, and Breschet; it is in the name
of this commission that I now present myself to make known to you the
result of our labours.
Already two commissions from the Academy of Sciences have been occupied
in the examination of this discovery of M. Gannal; the one, considering
the process as useful to the study of the sciences which concerns the
composition of organized beings; the other, considering it as a means
of rendering less insalubrious an art or a profession, a prize having
been founded for this purpose by M. de Monthyon, whose name will remain
eternally dear to science and to philanthropy.
The reasons which have hindered the ancients from carrying to any great
length a knowledge of the structure of man and animals, was not only
the idea of filthiness attached to the sight and dissection of dead
bodies, or the difficulty of procuring the means of dissection; but
rather the almost absolute impossibility of preserving dead bodies in
part or entire, which has retarded the progress of anatomy. Aristotle,
to whom Philip of Macedon had given every facility for the dissection
of animals, and who must have made collections, does not say, in any
of his known works, how he preserved the animals which he did not
immediately examine, and Galien, in his anatomical administrations,
says very few words of the means of preservation in liquors.
Cuvier, in giving the history of the progress of the natural sciences,
teaches us that one of the circumstances which has the most contributed
to the advancement of these sciences was the discovery of alcohol.
We are, however, astonished at the novelty of our means for the
preservation of animals, for zoological and anatomical collections,
when we reflect that during the time of Rèaumur the art of preserving
animal bodies with their natural forms and colours, was not known.
Thus, in the cabinet of this celebrated naturalist, are seen birds
skinned and suspended by the beak with a thread.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account