The track from Iôlkos to Kolchis, however, though plausible as far as
it went, did not realize all the conditions of the genuine fabulous
voyage: it did not explain the evidences of the visit of these
maritime heroes which were to be found in Libya, in Krêtê in Anaphê,
in Korkyra, in the Adriatic Gulf, in Italy and in Æthalia. It became
necessary to devise another route for them in their return, and the
Hesiodic narrative was (as I have before observed), that they came back
by the circumfluous ocean; first going up the river Phasis into the
circumfluous ocean; following that deep and gentle stream until they
entered the Nile, and came down its course to the coast of Libya. This
seems also to have been the belief of Hekatæus.[611] But presently
several Greeks (and Herodotus among them) began to discard the idea of
a circumfluous ocean-stream, which had pervaded their old geographical
and astronomical fables, and which explained the supposed easy
communication between one extremity of the earth and another. Another
idea was then started for the returning voyage of the Argonauts.
It was supposed that the river Ister, or Danube, flowing from the
Rhipæan mountains in the north-west of Europe, divided itself into two
branches, one of which fell into the Euxine Sea, and the other into the
Adriatic.
[611] See above, p. 239. There is an opinion cited from Hekatæus
in Schol. Apoll. Rhod. iv. 284. contrary to this, which is given
by the same scholiast on iv. 259. But, in spite of the remarks
of Klausen (ad. Fragment. Hekatæi, 187. p. 98), I think that the
Schol. ad. iv. 284 has made a mistake in citing Hekatæus; the
more so as the scholiast, as printed from the Codex Parisinus,
cites the same opinion without mentioning Hekatæus. According
to the old Homeric idea, the ocean stream flowed all round the
earth, and was the source of all the principal rivers which
flowed into the great internal sea, or Mediterranean (see
Hekatæus, Fr. 349; Klausen, ap. Arrian. ii. 16, where he speaks
of the Mediterranean as the μεγάλη θάλασσα). Retaining this old
idea of the ocean-stream, Hekatæus would naturally believe that
the Phasis joined it: nor can I agree with Klausen (ad Fr. 187)
that this implies a degree of ignorance too gross to impute to
him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account