No less than eight different dates have been assigned by
different chronologists for this eclipse,—the most ancient
625 B. C., the most recent 583 B. C. Volney is for 625 B. C.;
Larcher for 597 B. C.; Des Vignoles for 585 B. C.; Mr. Clinton
for 603 B. C. Volney observes, with justice, that the eclipse
on this occasion “n’est pas l’accessoire, la broderie du fait,
mais le _fait principal_ lui-même,” (p. 347:) the astronomical
calculations concerning the eclipse are, therefore, by far the
most important items in the chronological reckoning of this
event. Now in regard to the eclipse of 625 B. C., Volney is
obliged to admit that it does not suit the case; for it would
be visible only at half-past five in the morning on February 3,
and the sun would hardly be risen at that hour in the latitude
of Media and Lydia (p. 343). He seeks to escape from this
difficulty by saying that the data for the calculation, according
to the astronomer Pingré, are not quite accurate for these early
eclipses; but after all, if there be error, it may just as well
be in one direction as in another, _i. e._ the true hour at which
the eclipse would be visible for those latitudes is as likely
to have been _earlier_ than half-past five A. M. as to have
been later, which would put this eclipse still more out of the
question.
The chronology of that period presents difficulties which our
means of knowledge hardly enable us to clear up. Volney remarks,
and the language of Herodotus is with him, that not merely the
war between Kyaxarês and Alyattês (which lasted five years,
and was terminated by the eclipse), but also the conquest made
by Kyaxarês of the territory up to the river Halys, took place
anterior (Herodot. i, 103: compare i, 16) to the _first siege_
of Nineveh by Kyaxarês,—that siege which he was forced to raise
by the inroad of the Scythians. This constitutes a strong
presumption in favor of Volney’s date for the eclipse (625 B.
C.) if astronomical considerations would admit of it, which they
will not. Mr. Clinton, on the other hand, puts the first siege of
Nineveh in the very first year of the reign of Kyaxarês, which is
not to be reconciled with the language of Herodotus. In placing
the eclipse, therefore, in 603 B. C., we depart from the relative
arrangement of events which Herodotus conceived, in deference
to astronomical reasons: and Herodotus is our only authority in
regard to the general chronology.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account