According to Ideler, however (and his authority upon such a point
is conclusive, in my judgment), astronomical considerations
decisively fix this eclipse for the 30th September 610 B. C., and
exclude all those other eclipses which have been named. Recent
and more trustworthy calculations made by Oltmanns, from the
newest astronomical tables, have shown that the eclipse of 610 B.
C. fulfils the conditions required, and that the other eclipses
named do not. For a place situated in 40° N. lat. and 36° E.
long. this eclipse was nearly total, only one-eightieth of the
sun’s disc remaining luminous: the darkness thus occasioned would
be sufficient to cause great terror. (Ideler, Handbuch, _l. c._)
Since the publication of my first edition, I have been apprized
that the late Mr. Francis Baily had already settled the date of
this eclipse to the 30th of September 610 B. C., in his first
contribution to the Transactions of the Royal Society as long
ago as 1811,—much before the date of the publication of Ideler’s
Handbuch der Chronologie. Sir John Herschel (in his Memoir of
Mr. Francis Baily, in the Transactions of the Royal Astronomical
Society, vol. xv, p. 311), after completely approving Mr. Baily’s
calculations, and stating that he had been the first to solve the
disputed question, expresses his surprise that various French
and German astronomers, writing on the same subject afterwards,
have taken no notice of “that remarkable paper.” Though a
fellow-countryman of Mr. Baily, I am sorry that I have to plead
guilty to a similar ignorance, until the point was specially
brought to my notice by a friend. Had I been aware of the paper
and the Memoir, it would have been unnecessary to cite any other
authority than that of Mr. Baily and Sir John Herschel.
It was after this peace with Alyattês, as far as we can make out
the series of events in Herodotus, that Kyaxarês collected all his
forces and laid siege to Nineveh, but was obliged to desist by the
unexpected inroad of the Scythians. Nearly at the same time that
Upper Asia was desolated by these formidable nomads, Asia Minor too
was overrun by other nomads,—the Cimmerians,—Ardys being then king of
Lydia; and the two invasions, both spreading extreme disaster, are
presented to us as indirectly connected together in the way of cause
and effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account