Not long after the death of Dorieus, Kleander, despot of Gela, began
to raise his city to ascendency over the other Sicilian Greeks, who
had hitherto been, if not all equal, at least all independent. His
powerful mercenary force, levied in part among the Sikel tribes,[424]
did not preserve him from the sword of a Geloan citizen named
Sabyllus, who slew him after a reign of seven years: but it enabled
his brother and successor Hippokratês to extend his dominion over
nearly half of the island. In that mercenary force two officers,
Gelo and Ænesidêmus (the latter a citizen of Agrigentum, of the
conspicuous family of the Emmenidæ, and descended from Telemachus,
the deposer of Phalaris), particularly distinguished themselves. Gelo
was descended from a native of Têlos near the Triopian cape, one
of the original settlers who accompanied the Rhodian Antiphêmus to
Sicily. His immediate ancestor, named Têlinês, had first raised the
family to distinction, by valuable aid to a defeated political party,
who had been worsted in a struggle, and forced to seek shelter in
the neighboring town of Maktorium. Têlinês was possessed of certain
peculiar sacred rites (or visible and portable holy symbols, with
a privileged knowledge of the ceremonial acts and formalities of
divine service under which they were to be shown) for propitiating
the subterranean goddesses, Dêmêtêr and Persephonê; “from whom he
obtained them, or how he got at them himself (says Herodotus) I
cannot say:” but such was the imposing effect of his presence and
manner of exhibiting them, that he ventured to march into Gela at the
head of the exiles from Maktorium, and was enabled to reinstate them
in power,—deterring the people from resistance in the same manner as
the Athenians had been overawed by the spectacle of Phyê-Athênê in
the chariot along with Peisistratus. The extraordinary boldness of
this proceeding excites the admiration of Herodotus, especially as
he had been informed that Têlinês was of an unwarlike temperament:
the restored exiles rewarded it by granting to him, and to his
descendants after him, the hereditary dignity of hierophants of the
two goddesses,[425]—a function certainly honorable, and probably
lucrative, connected with the administration of consecrated property
and with the enjoyment of a large portion of its fruits.
[424] Polyænus, v, 6.
[425] See about Têlinês and this hereditary priesthood, Herodot.
vii, 153. τούτους ὦν ὁ Τηλίνης κατήγαγε ἐς Γέλην, ἔχων οὐδεμίαν
ἀνδρῶν δύναμιν, ἀλλ’ ἱρὰ τούτων τῶν θεῶν· ὅθεν δὲ αὐτὰ ἔλαβε, ἢ
αὐτὸς ἐκτήσατο, τοῦτο οὐκ ἔχω εἶπαι. τούτοισι δὲ ὦν πίσυνος ἐὼν,
κατήγαγε, ἐπ’ ᾧ τε οἱ ἀπόγονοι αὐτοῦ ἱροφάνται τῶν θεῶν ἔσονται:
compare a previous passage of this history, vol. i, chap. i, p.
26.
It appears from Pindar, that Hiero exercised this hereditary
priesthood (Olymp. vi, 160 (95), with the Scholia ad loc. and
Scholia ad Pindar. Pyth. ii, 27).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account