terrified, attempted hardly any resistance, but broke their order
and sought safety in flight. They fled partly to Patræ, partly to
Dymê, in Achaia, pursued by the Athenians; who, with scarcely the
loss of a man, captured twelve triremes, took aboard and carried away
almost the entire crews, and sailed off with them to Molykreium, or
Antirrhium, the northern cape at the narrow mouth of the Corinthian
gulf, opposite to the corresponding cape called Rhium in Achaia.
Having erected at Antirrhium a trophy for the victory, dedicating
one of the captive triremes to Poseidon, they returned to Naupaktus;
while the Peloponnesian ships sailed along the shore from Patræ to
Kyllênê, the principal port in the territory of Elis. They were here
soon afterwards joined by Knêmus, who passed over with his squadron
from Leukas.[342]
[341] See Dr. Arnold’s note upon this passage of Thucydidês,
respecting the keleustês and his functions: to the passages
which he indicates as reference, I will add two more of Plautus,
Mercat. iv, 2, 5, and Asinaria, iii, 1, 15.
When we conceive the structure of an ancient trireme, we shall
at once see, first, how essential the keleustês was, to keep the
rowers in harmonious action,—next, how immense the difference
must have been between practised and unpractised rowers. The
trireme had, in all, one hundred and seventy rowers, distributed
into three tiers. The upper tier, called thranitæ, were sixty-two
in number, or thirty-one on each side: the middle tier, or
zygitæ, as well as the lowest tier, or thalamitæ, were each
fifty-four in number, or twenty-seven on each side. Besides
these, there were belonging to each trireme a certain number,
seemingly about thirty, of supplementary oars (κῶπαι περινέω),
to be used by the epibatæ, or soldiers, serving on board, in
case of rowers being killed, or oars broken. Each tier of
rowers was distributed along the whole length of the vessel,
from head to stern, or at least along the greater part of it;
but the seats of the higher tiers were not placed in the exact
perpendicular line above the lower. Of course, the oars of the
thranitæ, or uppermost tier, were the longest: those of the
thalamitæ, or lowest tier, the shortest: those of the zygitæ, of
a length between the two. Each oar was rowed only by one man. The
thranitæ, as having the longest oars, were most hardly worked and
most highly paid. What the length of the oars was, belonging to
either tier, we do not know, but some of the supplementary oars
appear to have been about fifteen feet in length.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account