Now where a people are accustomed to get wrong in their calendar,
and to see occasional interferences introduced by authority
to set them right, the step which I here suppose the Argeians
to have taken about the invasion of Epidaurus will not appear
absurd and preposterous. The Argeians would pretend that the
real time for celebrating the festival of Karneia had not yet
arrived. On that point, they were not bound to follow the views
of other Dorian states, since there does not seem to have been
any recognized authority for proclaiming the commencement of the
Karneian truce, as the Eleians proclaimed the Olympic and the
Corinthians the Isthmiac truce. In saying, therefore, that the
twenty-sixth of the month preceding Karneius should be repeated,
and that the twenty-seventh should not be recognized as arriving
for a fortnight or three weeks, the Argeian government would
only be employing an expedient the like of which had been before
resorted to; though, in the case before us, it was employed for a
fraudulent purpose.
The Spartan month _Hekatombeus_ appears to have corresponded
with the Attic month Hekatombæon; the Spartan month following
it, _Karneius_, with the Attic month Metageitnion (Hermann, p.
112), our months July and August; such correspondence being by
no means exact or constant. Both Dr. Arnold and Göller speak of
Hekatombeus as if it were the _Argeian_ month preceding Karneius:
but we only know it as a _Spartan_ month. Its name does not
appear among the months of the Dorian cities in Sicily, among
whom nevertheless Karneius seems universal. See Franz, Comm. ad
Corp. Inscript. Græc. No. 5475, 5491, 5640. Part xxxii, p. 640.
The tricks played with the calendar at Rome, by political
authorities for party purposes, are well known to every one. And
even in some states of Greece, the course of the calendar was so
uncertain as to serve as a proverbial expression for inextricable
confusion. See Hesychius—~Ἐν Κέῳ τις ἡμέρα~; Ἐπὶ τῶν οὐκ
εὐγνώστον· οὐδεὶς γὰρ οἶδεν ἐν Κέῳ τις ἡ ἡμέρα, ὅτι οὐκ ἑστᾶσιν
αἱ ἡμέραι, ἀλλ’ ὡς ἕκαστοι θέλουσιν ἄγουσι. See also Aristoph.
Nubes, 605.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account