to send news to Athens and entreat relief.—Kallikratidas
defeats the squadron of Diomedon.—Prodigious effort of
the Athenians to relieve Konon—large Athenian fleet
equipped and sent to Arginusæ—Kallikratidas withdraws
most of his fleet from Mitylênê, leaving Eteonikus to
continue the blockade.—The two fleets marshalled for
battle.—Comparative nautical skill, reversed since the
beginning of the war.—Battle of Arginusæ—defeat of the
Lacedæmonians—death of Kallikratidas.—It would have been
better for Greece, and even for Athens, if Kallikratidas
had been victor at Arginusæ.—Safe escape of Eteonikus
and his fleet from Mitylênê to Chios.—Joy of Athens for
the victory—indignation arising from the fact that the
Athenian seamen on the disabled ships had not been picked
up after the battle.—State of the facts about the disabled
ships, and the men left in them.—Despatch of the generals
to Athens, affirming that a storm had prevented them from
saving the drowning men.—Justifiable wrath and wounded
sympathy of the Athenians—extreme excitement among the
relatives of the drowned men.—The generals are superseded,
and directed to come home.—Examination of the generals
before the senate and the people at Athens.—Debate in the
public assembly—Theramenês accuses the generals as guilty of
omitting to save the drowning men.—Effect of the accusation
by Theramenês upon the assembly.—Defence of the generals—they
affirm that they had commissioned Theramenês himself to
undertake the duty.—Reason why the generals had not mentioned
this commission in their despatch.—Different account given
by Diodorus.—Probable version of the way in which the facts
really occurred.—Justification of the generals—how far
valid?—The alleged storm. Escape of Eteonikus.—Feelings of
the Athenian public—how the case stood before them—decision
adjourned to a future assembly.—Occurrence of the festival
of Apaturia—the great family solemnity of the Ionic
race.—Burst of feeling at the Apaturia—misrepresented
by Xenophon.—Proposition of Kallixenus in the senate
against the generals—adopted and submitted to the public
assembly.—Injustice of the resolution—by depriving the
generals of the customary securities for judicial trial.
Psephism of Kannônus.—Opposition taken by Euryptolemus on the
ground of constitutional form.—Graphê Paranomôn.—Excitement
of the assembly—constitutional impediment overruled.—The
prytanes refuse to put the question—their opposition
overruled, all except that of Sokratês.—Altered temper
of the assembly when the discussion had begun—amendment
moved and developed by Euryptolemus.—Speech of
Euryptolemus.—His amendment is rejected—the proposition
of Kallixenus is carried.—The six generals are condemned
and executed.—Injustice of the proceeding—violation of the
democratical maxims and sentiments.—Earnest repentance of the
people soon afterwards—disgrace and end of Kallixenus.—Causes
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account