It seems evident, though Xenophon does not directly tell us so, that
the resistance of Syennesis, (this was a standing name or title of
the hereditary princes of Kilikia under the Persian crown), was a
mere feint; that the visit of Epyaxa with a supply of money to Cyrus,
and the admission of Menon and his division over Mount Taurus, were
manœuvres in collusion with him; and that, thinking Cyrus would be
successful, he was disposed to support his cause, yet careful at the
same time to give himself the air of having been overpowered, in case
Artaxerxes should prove victorious.[48]
[48] Diodorus (xiv, 20) represents Syennesis as playing a double
game, though reluctantly. He takes no notice of the proceeding of
Epyaxa.
So Livy says, about the conduct of the Macedonian courtiers in
regard to the enmity between Perseus and Demetrius, the two
sons of Philip II. of Macedon: “Crescente in dies Philippi
odio in Romanos, cui Perseus indulgeret, Demetrius summâ ope
adversaretur, prospicientes animo exitum incauti a fraude
fraternâ juvenis—_adjuvandum, quod futurum erat, rati,
fovendamque spem potentioris, Perseo se adjungunt_,” _etc._
(Livy, xl, 5).
At first, however, it appeared as if the march of Cyrus was destined
to finish at Tarsus, where he was obliged to remain twenty days. The
army had already passed by Pisidia, the ostensible purpose of the
expedition, for which the Grecian troops had been engaged; not one of
them, either officer or soldier, suspecting anything to the contrary,
except Klearchus, who was in the secret. But all now saw that they
had been imposed upon, and found out that they were to be conducted
against the Persian king. Besides the resentment at such delusion,
they shrunk from the risk altogether; not from any fear of Persian
armies, but from the terrors of a march of three months inward from
the coast, and the impossibility of return, which had so powerfully
affected the Spartan King Kleomenes,[49] a century before; most of
them being (as I have before remarked) men of decent position and
family in their respective cities. Accordingly they proclaimed their
determination to advance no farther, as they had not been engaged to
fight against the Great King.[50]
[49] See Herodot. v. 49.
[50] Xen. Anab. i, 3, 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account