3. The news of the revolution at Thebes must necessarily have
taken the Athenian public completely by surprise (though some
few Athenians were privy to the scheme), because it was a scheme
which had no chance of succeeding except by profound secrecy.
Now, that the Athenian public, hearing the news for the first
time,—having no positive act to complain of on the part of
Sparta, and much reason to fear her power,—having had no previous
circumstances to work them up, or prepare them for any dangerous
resolve,—should identify themselves at once with Thebes,
and provoke war with Sparta in the impetuous manner stated
by Diodorus,—this is, in my judgment, eminently improbable,
requiring good evidence to induce us to believe it.
4. Assume the statement of Diodorus to be true,—what reasonable
explanation can be given of the erroneous version which we
read in Xenophon? The facts as he recounts them conflict most
pointedly with his philo-Laconian partialities; first, the
overthrow of the Lacedæmonian power at Thebes, by a handful
of exiles; still more, the whole story of Sphodrias and his
acquittal.
But assume the statement of Xenophon to be true,—and we can
give a very plausible explanation how the erroneous version
in Diodorus arose. A few months later, after the acquittal of
Sphodrias at Sparta, the Athenians did enter heartily into
the alliance of Thebes, and sent a large public force (indeed
five thousand hoplites, the same number as those of Demophon,
according to Diodorus, c. 32) to assist her in repelling
Agesilaus with the Spartan army. It is by no means unnatural
that their public vote and expedition undertaken about July 378
B.C.,—should have been erroneously thrown back to December 379
B.C. The Athenian orators were fond of boasting that Athens
had saved the Thebans from Sparta; and this might be said with
some truth, in reference to the aid which she really rendered
afterwards. Isokrates (Or. Plataic. s. 31) makes this boast in
general terms; but Deinarchus (cont. Demosthen. s. 40) is more
distinct, and gives in a few words a version the same as that
which we find in Diodorus; so also does Aristeides, in two very
brief allusions (Panathen. p. 172, and Or. xxxviii, Socialis, p.
486-498). Possibly Aristeides as well as Diodorus may have copied
from Ephorus; but however this may be, it is easy to understand
the mistake out of which their version grew.
5. Lastly, Plutarch mentions nothing about the public vote of
the Athenians, and the regular division of troops under Demophon
which Diodorus asserts to have aided in the storming of the
Kadmeia. See Plutarch (De Gen. Socrat. ad fin. Agesil. c. 23;
Pelopid. 12, 13). He intimates only, as Xenophon does, that there
were some Athenian volunteers who assisted the exiles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account