[476] Aristotle (in his Politica, iv, 10, 5), discussing the
opinion of those political philosophers who maintained that a
city ought to have no walls, but to be defended only by the
bravery of its inhabitants,—gives various reasons against such
opinion, and adds “that these are old-fashioned thinkers; that
the cities which made such ostentatious display of personal
courage, have been proved to be wrong by actual results”—λίαν
ἀρχαίως ὑπολαμβάνουσι, καὶ ταῦθ’ ὁρῶντες ἐλεγχομένας ἔργῳ τὰς
ἐκείνως καλλωπισαμένας.
The commentators say (see the note of M. Barth. St. Hilaire) that
Aristotle has in his view Sparta at the moment of this Theban
invasion. I do not see what else he can mean; yet at the same
time, if such be his meaning, the remark is surely difficult to
admit. Epaminondas came close up to Sparta, but did not dare
to attempt to carry it by assault. If the city had had walls
like those of Babylon, they could not have procured for her
any greater protection. To me the fact appears rather to show
(contrary to the assertion of Aristotle) that Sparta was so
strong by position, combined with the military character of her
citizens, that she could dispense with walls.
Polyænus (ii, 2, 5) has an anecdote, I know not from whom
borrowed, to the effect that Epaminondas might have taken
Sparta, but designedly refrained from doing so, on the ground
that the Arcadians and others would then no longer stand in need
of Thebes. Neither the alleged matter of fact, nor the reason,
appear to me worthy of any credit. Ælian (V. H. iv, 8) has the
same story, but with a different reason assigned.
On leaving Sparta, Epaminondas carried his march as far as Helos
and Gythium on the sea-coast; burning and plundering the country,
and trying for three days to capture Gythium, which contained the
Lacedæmonian arsenal and ships. Many of the Laconian Periœki joined
and took service in his army; nevertheless his attempt on Gythium
did not succeed; upon which he turned back and retraced his steps to
the Arcadian frontier. It was the more necessary for him to think of
quitting Laconia, since his Peloponnesian allies, the Arcadians and
others, were daily stealing home with the rich plunder which they had
acquired, while his supplies were also becoming deficient.[477]
[477] Xen. Hellen. vi, 5, 50; Diodor. xv, 67.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account