[241] Plutarch, Dion, c. 48.
[242] Diodor. xvi. 20.
A public assembly was now held to elect new generals in place of
those who had fled. Here a motion was made by Herakleides himself,
that Dion should be chosen general with full powers both by land
and sea. The motion was received with great favor by the principal
citizens; but the poorer men were attached to Herakleides, especially
the seamen; who preferred serving under his command, and loudly
required that he should be named admiral, along with Dion as general
on land. Forced to acquiesce in this nomination, Dion contented
himself with insisting and obtaining, that the resolution, which had
been previously adopted for redistributing lands and houses, should
be rescinded.[243]
[243] Plutarch, Dion, c. 48.
The position of affairs at Syracuse was now pregnant with mischief
and quarrel. On land, Dion enjoyed a dictatorial authority;—at sea,
Herakleides, his enemy not less than ever, was admiral, by separate
and independent nomination. The undefined authority of Dion—exercised
by one self-willed, though magnanimous, in spirit, and extremely
repulsive in manner—was sure to become odious after the feelings
arising out of the recent rescue had worn off; and abundant opening
would thus be made for the opposition of Herakleides, often on just
grounds. That officer indeed was little disposed to wait for just
pretences. Conducting the Syracusan fleet to Messênê in order to
carry on war against Dionysius at Lokri, he not only tried to raise
the seamen in arms against Dion, by charging him with despotic
designs, but even entered into a secret treaty with the common enemy
Dionysius; through the intervention of the Spartan Pharax, who
commanded the Dionysian troops. His intrigues being discovered, a
violent opposition was raised against them by the leading Syracusan
citizens. It would seem (as far as we can make out from the
scanty information of Plutarch) that the military operations were
frustrated, and that the armament was forced to return to Syracuse.
Here again the quarrel was renewed—the seamen apparently standing
with Herakleides, the principal citizens with Dion—and carried so
far, that the city suffered not only from disturbance, but even
from irregular supply of provisions.[244] Among the mortifications
of Dion, not the least was that which he experienced from his
own friends or soldiers, who reminded him of their warnings and
predictions when he consented to spare Herakleides. Meanwhile
Dionysius had sent into Sicily a body of troops under Pharax, who
were encamped at Neapolis in the Agrigentine territory. In what
scheme of operations this movement forms a part, we cannot make
out; for Plutarch tells us nothing except what bears immediately
on the quarrel between Dion and Herakleides. To attack Pharax, the
forces of Syracuse were brought out; the fleet under Herakleides,
the soldiers on land under Dion. The latter, though he thought
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account