How this project—the natural growth of Dion’s mind, for which his
tastes and capacities were suited—was violently thrust aside through
the alienated feelings of the younger Dionysius—has been already
recounted. The position of Dion was now completely altered. He became
a banished, ill-used man, stung with contemptuous antipathy against
Dionysius, and eager to put down his despotism over Syracuse. Here
were new motives apparently falling in with the old project. But
the conditions of the problem had altogether changed. Dion could
not overthrow Dionysius without “taking the Syracusan people into
partnership” (to use the phrase of Herodotus[267] respecting the
Athenian Kleisthenes)—without promising them full freedom, as an
inducement for their hearty coöperation—without giving them arms, and
awakening in them the stirring impulses of Grecian citizenship, all
the more violent because they had been so long trodden down.[268]
With these new allies he knew not how to deal. He had no experience
of a free and jealous popular mind in persuasion, he was utterly
unpractised: his manners were haughty and displeasing. Moreover, his
kindred with the Dionysian family exposed him to antipathy from two
different quarters. Like the Duke of Orleans (Égalité) at the end
of 1792, in the first French Revolution—he was hated both by the
royalists, because, though related to the reigning dynasty, he had
taken an active part against it—and by sincere democrats, because
they suspected him of a design to put himself in its place. To Dion,
such coalition of antipathies was a serious hindrance; presenting
a strong basis of support for all his rivals, especially for the
unscrupulous Herakleides. The bad treatment which he underwent both
from the Syracusans and from Herakleides, during the time when
the officers of Dionysius still remained masters in Ortygia, has
been already related. Dion however behaved, though not always with
prudence, yet with so much generous energy against the common enemy,
that he put down his rival, and maintained his ascendency unshaken,
until the surrender of Ortygia.
[267] Herodotus, v. 66. ἑσσούμενος δ᾽ ὁ Κλεισθένης τὸν δῆμον
προσεταιρίζεται.
[268] Cicero de Officiis, ii. 7. “Acriores morsus intermissæ
libertatis quam retentæ.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account