The loss of such a citizen as Timotheus was a fresh misfortune to
her. He had conducted her armies with signal success, maintained
the honor of her name throughout the eastern and western seas, and
greatly extended the list of her foreign allies. She had recently
lost Chabrias in battle; a second general, Timotheus, was now
taken from her; and the third, Iphikrates, though acquitted at the
last trial, seems, as far as we can make out, never to have been
subsequently employed on military command. These three were the
last eminent military citizens at Athens; for Phokion, though brave
and deserving, was not to be compared with either of them. On the
other hand, Chares, a man of great personal courage, but of no other
merit, was now in the full swing of reputation. The recent judicial
feud between the three Athenian admirals had been doubly injurious
to Athens, first as discrediting Iphikrates and Timotheus, next as
exalting Chares, to whom the sole command was now confided.
In the succeeding year, 356 B. C., Chares conducted another powerful
fleet to attack the revolted allies. Being however not furnished
with adequate funds from home to pay his troops, chiefly foreign
mercenaries, he thought it expedient, on his own responsibility,
to accept an offer from Artabazus (satrap of Daskylium and the
region south of the Propontis), then in revolt against the Persian
king.[482] Chares joined Artabazus with his own army, reinforced by
additional bodies of mercenaries recently disbanded by the Persian
satraps. With this entire force he gave battle to the king’s troops
under the command of Tithraustes, and gained a splendid victory;
upon which Artabazus remunerated him so liberally, as to place the
whole Athenian army in temporary affluence. The Athenians at home
were at first much displeased with their general, for violating
his instructions, and withdrawing his army from its prescribed
and legitimate task. The news of his victory, however, and of the
lucrative recompense following it, somewhat mollified them. But
presently they learned that the Persian king, indignant at such a
gratuitous aggression on their part, was equipping a large fleet to
second the operations of their enemies. Intimidated by the prospect
of Persian attack, they became anxious to conclude a peace with
the revolted allies; who, on their part, were not less anxious to
terminate the war. Embassies being exchanged, and negotiations
opened, in the ensuing year (355 B. C., the third of the war), a
peace was sworn, whereby the Athenians recognized the complete
autonomy, and severance from their confederacy, of the revolted
cities, Chios, Rhodes, Kos, and Byzantium.[483]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account