[484] Curtius, vii. 23; Plutarch de Serâ Numinis Vindictâ, p.
557 B; Strabo xi. p. 518: compare also xiv. p. 634, and xvii. p.
814. This last-mentioned passage of Strabo helps us to understand
the peculiarly strong pious fervor with which Alexander regarded
the temple and oracle of Branchidæ. At the time when Alexander
went up to the oracle of Ammon in Egypt, for the purpose of
affiliating himself to Zeus Ammon, there came to him envoys from
Miletus, announcing that the oracle at Branchidæ, which had been
silent ever since the time of Xerxes, had just begun to give
prophecy, and had certified the fact that Alexander was the son
of Zeus, besides many other encouraging predictions.
The massacre of the Branchidæ by Alexander was described by
Diodorus, but was contained in that part of the seventeenth book
which is lost; there is a great lacuna in the MSS. after cap.
83. The fact is distinctly indicated in the table of contents
prefixed to Book xvii.
Arrian makes no mention of these descendants of the Branchidæ in
Sogdiana, nor of the destruction of the town and its inhabitants
by Alexander. Perhaps neither Ptolemy nor Aristobulus, said
anything about it. Their silence is not at all difficult to
explain, nor does it, in my judgment, impeach the credibility
of the narrative. They do not feel under obligation to give
publicity to the worst acts of their hero.
[485] The Delphian oracle pronounced, in explaining the
subjugation and ruin of Krœsus king of Lydia, that he had thereby
expiated the sin of his ancestor in the fifth generation before
(Herodot. i. 91: compare vi. 86). Immediately before the breaking
out of the Peloponnesian war, the Lacedæmonians called upon the
Athenians to expel the descendants of those who had taken part
in the Kylonian sacrilege, 180 years before; they addressed this
injunction with a view to procure the banishment of Perikles, yet
still τοῖς θεοῖς πρῶτον τιμωροῦντες (Thucyd. i. 125-127).
The idea that the sins of fathers were visited upon their
descendants, even to the third and fourth generation, had great
currency in the ancient world.
[486] Diodor. xiii. 62. See Vol. X. Ch. lxxxi. p 413 of this
History.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account