[565] Curtius, ix. 10; Diodor. xvii. 106; Plutarch, Alex. 67.
Arrian (vi. 28) found this festal progress mentioned in some
authorities, but not in others. Neither Ptolemy nor Aristobulus
mentioned it. Accordingly Arrian refuses to believe it. There
may have been exaggerations or falsities as to the details of
the march; but as a general fact, I see no sufficient ground for
disbelieving it. A season of excessive license to the soldiers,
after their extreme suffering in Gedrosia, was by no means
unnatural to grant. Moreover, it corresponds to the general
conception of the returning march of Dionysus in antiquity,
while the imitation of that god was quite in conformity with
Alexander’s turn of sentiment.
I have already remarked, that the silence of Ptolemy and
Aristobulus is too strongly insisted on, both by Arrian and by
others, as a reason for disbelieving affirmations respecting
Alexander.
Arrian and Curtius (x. 1) differ in their statements about the
treatment of Kleander. According to Arrian, he was put to death;
according to Curtius, he was spared from death, and simply put
in prison, in consequence of the important service which he had
rendered by killing Parmenio with his own hand; while 600 of his
accomplices and agents were put to death.
During the halt in Karmania Alexander had the satisfaction of seeing
his admiral Nearchus,[566] who had brought the fleet round from the
mouth of the Indus to the harbor called Harmozeia (Ormuz), not far
from the entrance of the Persian Gulf; a voyage of much hardship
and distress, along the barren coasts of the Oritæ, the Gedrosians,
and the Ichthyophagi.[567] Nearchus, highly commended and honored,
was presently sent back to complete his voyage as far as the mouth
of the Euphrates; while Hephæstion also was directed to conduct the
larger portion of the army, with the elephants and heavy baggage,
by the road near the coast from Karmania into Persis. This road,
though circuitous, was the most convenient, as it was now the winter
season;[568] but Alexander himself, with the lighter divisions of his
army, took the more direct mountain road from Karmania to Pasargadæ
and Persepolis. Visiting the tomb of Cyrus the Great, founder of the
Persian empire, he was incensed to find it violated and pillaged.
He caused it to be carefully restored, put to death a Macedonian
named Polymachus as the offender, and tortured the Magian guardians
of it for the purpose of discovering accomplices, but in vain.[569]
Orsines, satrap of Persis, was however accused of connivance in
the deed, as well as of various acts of murder and spoliation:
according to Curtius, he was not only innocent, but had manifested
both good faith and devotion to Alexander;[570] in spite of which
he became a victim of the hostility of the favorite eunuch Bagoas,
who both poisoned the king’s mind with calumnies of his own, and
suborned other accusers with false testimony. Whatever may be the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account