History of Human SocietyBlackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
History
History of Human Society
Blackmar, Frank W. (Frank Wilson)
Civilization; Progress; Sociology
_Progress Is Through the Food Supply_.--This is only another view of
the economic life. The first period is called the natural subsistence
period, when man used such food as he found prepared for him by nature.
It corresponds to the primal nomadic period of the last classification.
From this state he advanced to the use of fish for food, and then
entered the third period, when native grains were obtained through a
limited cultivation of the soil. After this followed a period in which
meat and milk were the chief articles of food. Finally the period of
extended and permanent agriculture was reached, and farinaceous food by
cultivation became the main support of life. The significance of this
classification is observed in the fact that the amount, variety, and
quality of the food available determine the possibility of man's
material and spiritual advancement. As the food supply lies at the
foundation of human existence, prosperity is measured to a large extent
by the food products. The character of the food affects to a great
extent the mental and moral capabilities of man; that is, it {41}
limits the possibilities of civilization. Even in modern civilization
the effect of poor food on intellect, morals, and social order is
easily observed.
_Progress Is Estimated by Different Forms of Social Order_.--It is only
a more general way of estimating political life, and perhaps a broader
way, for it includes the entire social development. By this
classification man is first represented as wandering in a solitary
state with the smallest amount of association with his fellows
necessary to his existence and perpetuation, and with no social
organization. This status of man is hypothetical, and gives only a
starting point for the philosophy of higher development. No savage
tribes have yet been discovered in which there was not at least
association of individuals in groups, although organization might not
yet have appeared. It is true that some of the lower tribes, like the
Fuegians of South America, have very tentative forms of social and
political association. They wander in loosely constructed groups,
which constantly shift in association, being without permanent
organization. Yet the purely solitary man is merely conjectural.
It is common for writers to make a classification of social groups into
primary and secondary.[2] The primary social groups are: first, the
family based upon biological relations, supported by the habit of
association; second, the play group of children, in which primitive
characters of social order appear, and a third group is the association
of adults in a neighborhood meeting. In the formation of these groups,
the process of social selection is always in evidence. Impulse,
feeling, and emotion play the greater parts in the formation of these
primitive groups, while choice based on rational selection seldom
appears.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account