History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
The first peculiarity that strikes one as distinguishing the Jaina
architecture of the south from that of the north, is the division of the
southern temples into two classes, called Bastis and Bettus.[294] The
former are temples in the usual acceptance of the word, as understood in
the north, and, as there, always containing an image of one of the
twenty-four Tirthankars, which is the object there worshipped. The
latter are unknown in the north; and are courtyards open to the sky and
containing images, not of a Tirthankar, but of a Gômati or Gômata Raja
so called, though who he was, and why worshipped, no one seems exactly
to know. He is not known to the Jains in the north. All the images on
the rock at Gualior are of one or other of the Tirthankars, and even the
Ulwar colossus, Nan Gûngi, can hardly be identified with these southern
images. It looks almost as if some vague tradition of Gautama Buddha the
prince, as distinguished from Mahavira the last of the Tirthankars, and
who is said to have been his preceptor, had in late times penetrated to
the south, and given rise to this peculiar form. Be this, however, as it
may, the images of this king or Jaina saint are among the most
remarkable works of native art in the south of India. Three of them are
known, and have long been known to Europeans,[295] and it is doubtful if
any more exist. They are too remarkable objects not to attract the
attention of even the most indifferent Saxon. That at Sravana Belgula
attracted the attention of the late Duke of Wellington when, as Sir A.
Wellesley, he commanded a division at the siege of Seringapatam. He,
like all those who followed him, was astonished at the amount of labour
such a work must have entailed, and puzzled to know whether it was a
part of the hill or had been moved to the spot where it now stands. The
former is the more probable theory. The hill called Indra Giri is one
mass of granite about 400 ft. in height, and probably had a mass or Tor
standing on its summit--either a part of the subjacent mass or lying on
it. This the Jains undertook to fashion into a statue 70 ft. 3 in. in
height, and have achieved it with marvellous success. The task of
carving a rock standing in its place the Hindu mind never would have
shrunk from, had it even been twice the size; but to move such a mass up
the steep smooth side of the hill seems a labour beyond their power,
even with all their skill in concentrating masses of men on a single
point. Whether, however, the rock was found _in situ_ or was moved,
nothing grander or more imposing exists anywhere out of Egypt, and even
there no known statue surpasses it in height, though, it must be
confessed, they do excel it in the perfection of art they exhibit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account